Robsk II

Shut up, idiots.

They'd better get used to that, let's be honest. Rematch!

The ref OK'd it, I heard. Had he not done so, I would have understood that controversy because perhaps the rules about subs might not have been made clear to Jordan et al. Still, as I can confirm it was definitely approved, it's case closed. The goal was valid.

It's all to do with the global econonmic crisis - selling brands that are already established guarantees an audience, even if the output is risible.

The gums - as a membrane, you can absrob it through the gums. Yes, your gums go numb. You don't, in theory, hallucinate, though some have claimed to. It was like a lot of other drugs - traditionally a party thing or whatever, but these things always get taken to extremes by some. Downers, no, it doesn't work like that, but some people get really glum come-downs. Anxiety, sleeping badly and so on can happen. In the longer term, or with high usage, you can get blood pressure problems, etc. If you overdose, it certainly can be pretty ****ed up, fatal even.

Cocaine is a funny drug, the way it works means that you have to 'develop a taste' for it. No matter what some might say, it doesn't do much for most people the first time you do it. Your brain has to work out what to do with it, to learn the need it, first, in a way. After that, well, it's a buzz. Some people love it, doesn't fuss some others - but it's a bastard because you want more and more. If you want to keep the same impact, you feel driven have to up your amount over time until.. yeah, it can be a bit dodgy. One of the reasons people consider it to be the real 'gateway' drug to, erm, harder stuff. Yes, I know, you can't get above class A, but it's on the bottom line of class A in some ways. Won't do much harm alone (most of the Westbrook style septum damage comes from the other **** its produced with - blow your nose folks, even though it might not seem cool to your snow-loving lawyer mates) but it ****s your money and people on a buzz often act like ****s. Really self-absorbed, etc. As for frequency of use - it depends on your circles. In some, it's well high - I know some people who do it and so do all of their mates - but I also know others who do use other lighter stuff who have mates who mostly haven't or a least don't touch it. It seems a natural graduation for the pill-poppers, etc - the leisure user - so if it's a liberal group with a vague apathy towards drugs legislation, or a love of hardcore dance, or.. well.. money - there's a good chance a fair number have used it. off the top of my head, I'd guesstimate about a quarter of people have tried it within that range.

Yes, I was a 'founding member' of Santos.. for my sins. I think there's a middle ground Stevo. I don't like losing, of course I don't. It is also frustrating to see players who are genuinely awful. I would expect team-mates to bust a gut trying to win, and to get better as a team, play in the right way etc. All I mean is that people should be able to take losing, and quite often it would happen less if people trated the game with the right attitude instead of getting stressed, being childish and so on. At the end of the day, I can take losing, but I do hate it if I feel I play badly within my own limited potential. Even on a SW Sunday kickabout. Of course losing week after week is demoralising, but I think there are good ways and bad ways to deal with it and change things. Too many people get that wrong, IMO. I can also understand competing at a higher level and getting annoyed, whatever, but part of being a good sportsperson really is about how you lose and learn from it. Maybe my experience comes from a solo sport, primarily, but I learnt a lot of tough lessons about sport early on, so I just think Sunday football etc is healthier with perspective. Getting in a mardy at other people, or having a strop, or sulking after losing, achieves **** all - I think we can agree on that.

I've never seen that before. I have saved it. It is great. Thanks Sev.

What was the score Jordan? Hmm? Did you thrash us as expected?

Best starting debut I've seen for a while at Saints, without a doubt. he wasn't perfect, but he seemed pretty bloody good for this level, and DID win the vast majority of balls he contended with - which were a good number, too.

What a ****ing idiot.

Yes.

Conducting foreign policy in a way that doesn't **** these people off, and supplying the means to give populations educaton, information, etc.. means they are less likely to become radicalised.

Frankly, with an ego like yours, I'm not sure the football community will miss your undoubted talents.. Also, Santos could have been a decent thing, but it became too filled with egos with ideas well above their station. If people realised that it's a game, and set out to enjoy it first and foremost - and tried to improve and win games as a unit, rather than just get their mates in - it would go better. No offence, but no-one in Santos or anywhere 5 leagues above it has anything to gain by winning a game, scoring or anything else. You're not being paid, you're not playing for a contract, you're far too late to ever make it anywhere in the game. You'll never even achieve anything at any other level than the one you set yourself. In the grand scheme of it, 99% of players are basically ****e. So who cares? Get some perspective.

Let's make Bill Cosby king. The supposed EDL might have some members who believe only in stating a case against extremism, but what about extremism in other forms? Targetting muslim communites will make no difference but to further disillusion those more prone to being sucked into more dubious views. Yelling about it will not stop anyone who intends to kill people, it will just give them further evidence that the West is against Islam. The majority of the 'member's will just be old fashioned racists looking to intimidate some innocent people and hopefully stove in the head of some 'foreign'. The inevitable involvement of these people will not help any cause, either. Why do the morons in this country assume that everyone but far right hater-types love it when terrorism occurs? Love it when innocent people get killed? Retarded.

Supposedly, this demo is not at a release level yet. Makes you wonder why they release it.. because many supposed insiders are saying that the newer version is much, much harder, and has much better response times. Who knows.

Do you have 9" and a stiff shaft? Also a set of balls?

I hope you were all f*cked on drugs.

Any post match drinking will be amusing by grace of the fact that the opposition won't be allowed any alcohol...

I am ****ing knackered. I'll do 11-a-side.

I never said we shouldn't go for the win, thickie. I just pointed out that a draw away from home against a team who have won their last 6 is a decent result. It could be better, but only a total moron would suggest that a draw would not be a bad result.

What? No, a draw away against a team who have won 6 on the bounce is a good result, regardless of our position. Not the result we want, but.. hey. Pointless negative stupidity from you.

Who was the first person to add a fifth dimension to general relativity?

I think that EA's decision to offer a ****ter version for PC is retarded. Yes, I am aware of their reasons, and console-centric idiots might well make some stupid and predictable (but always repeated, never fulfilled) comment about the PC being an increasingly irrelevent platform - but the fact is it that it is one reason I won't consider buying it. PES does this right, at least, and while this is due to their core markets, it still seems to make more sense to me to do as Konami have done - simple have scalability options. PES looks better on the PC than anywhere else if you've got a decent system, and rightly so.

Need any more evidence to prove that B Jizzle is a grade A moron?