JohnnyFartPants

If there is a need to feel humble, usually I make that transition. Currently I think there isn't.

Baked beans on toast with two poached eggs on top.

Oh, I don't know, most of your comments are pretty flat!

Now we are getting somewhere. If only you had stopped the original casual xenophobia instead of publicly supporting it this would never have got this far. I bet you are great to work with. No, I really bet you are.Laugh a minute. I can just imagine having a pint with you, "and then I said to him, you haven't used the multi quote function, oh you should have been there, it was brilliant. We all laughed so hard that we forgot to order a copy of "complete bender PC Nerd monthly"."

I think I just held my hand up to those mistakes myself, thus indicating I do make mistakes. It seems you are the one that backtracks and makes light of any you have made. Further to this, your constant reference to forum use of things such as multi quotes and who quotes who is all a bit nerdy-geek boy, isn't it? I know you will liken this to spelling words properly but that's mainly to cover your inadequacies in your mother tongue.

Not at all. If I were to be in the mood for antagonism, I would stick to simply reminding you that your post should read, "argue "for" arguments sake."

Oops!! I am tired!!

Does this mean you consider white settler second generation Africans to be less African than the black ones? Didn't we have a debate about black English football players not caring as much when they play for their country as white ones a while back? Bungle has been very equal in pointing out that Africans are Africans whereas you and Pancake see fit to pigeon hole them into proper and non proper Africans. God knows why American slipped in there. Consider it corrected!!

You could just simply explain why there are no white Africans in your opinion. That is mainly what he was asking. To use an expression of yours, the stick comment was a bit of a sidestep. Is this yet again a "one rule for you, one rule for us" scenario?

To be totally fair, and as much as I like DSM for his usually unbiased opinion, in this instance it was a case of in house support networking.

Come see the violence inherent in the system.

Ooh, he's having a go at the birds now, says they are all scroungers!

In fairness, that is what Northerners are for.

That's all well and good but what if you say someone's nose is too big and you already knew they were Jewish? Furthermore, were you thinking of a Jew when you said it or, perhaps Barry Manilow? What have you got against Barry Manilow anyway?

What are you driving, a Bentley?

As soon as you supported it being okay to call someone "too black" this view became obvious.

Well it would, wouldn't it? I concede that. He could have been a black French tw at or a white French tw at though. To stop being racist in this instance it is best to remove the colour of his skin from the argument and just stick to the basics. He is a French tw at. A tw at that is French. To argue against you is to say for instance that you didn't like someone as they were too black. That would never do.

It isn't really beside the point. Basically the reverse to this is to say that black British people are not really British in your eyes. It's the same both ways you know.

No worries. I aim to buy in Spring next year.

You shouldn't call African people "has beens." They deserve the same respect as the French, Germans and even the Dutch. Even if they are tw ats.

That is pretty much the stance I took to be honest. He is French and also a bit of a tw at for getting his hand stuck down the toilet and causing so much hassle for all concerned. It in no way affects my feelings towards the French or will affect my plans to buy a holiday home in Brittany.

It's all too much for me to work out. If he does report his own post, can he then back his post when defending himself later on? Maybe he would be able to sign something to say that at the time of making his post he was losing heavily in an argument, thus making him resort to the very kind of language that they ask us to refrain from using. By doing so I feel the other mods will take him under their wing for some extra training and he will hit the road in good form for the future.

So will you be awarding them to people who call Bungle thick? I don't get this. A minute ago you had no problem with me calling you obvious things that I picked up from merely conversing with you. Now I am to stop doing it. I just don't understand. I am trying to live by your rules but you say something, then change your mind, then you do something and say it can't be done by me. Please help me. Love JFP

No it isn't. How can someone that makes what they think a viable complaint be sure that it has been looked at and not considered viable, if none of you lot can't be arsed to inform them? It makes a mockery of having the system there. You are a bell end, if that's still okay to state the obvious?

There are a list of rules of what can and can't be said but at the end of the day you are in the hands of moderators, some of which are basically dim. Rather than see the obvious racist comment from "a mate" they go on about the harsh forum sin of not multi- quoting. **** me, I dread the day when I get called in and arrested by the forum police for that crime.