Weston Super Saint

Yes I do, because that was my point.

Statistically, how do their goals conceded compare with ours? You know, statistically....

I am well aware of that - it was written in the article I posted. That particular sub variant has so far infected 34 people (28 in the same care home) and not one of them has been seriously ill. Not sure that the planned 'autumn' rollout has actually been brought forward a huge amount though....

Indeed. I've already stated that I've had not one, but three vaccinations. I also answered your previous question (truthfully) about whether there was anyone who now regretted having the vaccine. Put me in that camp for sure. Whilst I appreciate people suffer side effects to some medication, in general those side effects are known about before the medication is taken and the risks are weighed against the rewards. 'Headache' was listed as a side effect of the vaccine, but in the same way as a 'sore arm' was listed. No warning was given that it would happen every time I undertake vigorous exercise for at least two years afterwards (I get that that was unlikely to be known when the vaccine was rolled out, but doesn't that bolster the regret about taking an untested vaccine?). I thank the Lord every day though that I haven't turned into a lizard person and so far I don't have any particular need to use Microsoft products....

It's not in any doubt and I've never suggested otherwise. I've only suggested that it is very convenient that there is a new strain of COVID that is helping to 'sell' the booster programme. It's already been admitted during the COVID enquiry that scaremongering has been rife to increase vaccine take up, yet here we are again with another convenient new strain just when one is needed.

Unbelievable post. Perhaps read my previous posts from earlier today and see if there are any hints about my 'anti-vax' stance. Then give your head a wobble, oddball.

Maybe. But having a headache the same day as the vaccine that did not go away for around 8 weeks probably points to the vaccine rather than an illness I never even knew I had...

Yep, all those must be the reason and definitely not the fact that the booster programme is just starting. Oddball.

And yet, not one of them have made the news up until the newest one, just before the booster programme is being launched. You seem to be struggling with why I have stated that is a coincidence....

The symptoms started after the first vaccination (August 2021). I did not have my first bout of COVID until May 2022, so the symptoms can only be linked to the vaccination.

Unless you are over 65 or in a select group of vulnerable people or work with vulnerable people then you aren't eligible, so you won't be treating yourself....

Whilst your suncream analogy is obviously hilarious, it is also totally irrelevant and pointless. COVID can be caught year round - I had it in April, Mrs WSS had it in May and again in September and we have both had all the vaccinations we are eligible for. The "coincidence" refers to the new strain being announced (30 odd people have had it since August) just in time for the booster rollout.

It isn't, sadly. I regret having the jab - well certainly having the AZ one. Since I had that one (my first), I spent six hours in hospital after two weeks as I had a headache that would not go for the whole time, I had blood tests for clots but nothing. The constant headache lasted for about 8 weeks in total. I still suffer miserably when I exercise and my heart rate goes over 90% of maximum for more than 20 seconds - I am then wiped out with a headache for the rest of the day and can do very little. I've had blocked sinuses for 2 years now since the first jab. Doctor's have been useless to date and I have to have a steroid spray on prescription (£9.75 per month) as well as decongestant sprays that cost about another £20 per month. All that and I've had COVID three times since having the jabs.

Call me cynical, but wow, new variant just in time for the rollout of the booster programme. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-66750365

I'm not falling for that one! Next thing I know the police will be asking awkward questions.

Rule 1?

Presumably not even Saints are so stupid as to add one of those in that THEY can activate?

What a complete mystery. A poster who could start an argument in a locked room, hmmmm, I wonder who that could be?

Not as much as 7th in the league.

There's no rush though, probably best to wait for the ten year anniversary.

Wow. That's a fabulous point. No wonder you used a picture and quote from Thatcher to tell us it.

It's not in any doubt. No idea what the fuck that's got to do with Thatcher though. I've stated before that ALL climate scientists have an agenda, you just need to follow the money to find out which one it is.

Bless you for getting the wrong end of the stick. The claim is that climate scientists who have agendas are being incentivised, not Prime Minister's 30 fucking years ago. But it comes as no surprise that the finer details have passed you by as always.

To be fair, he's demanding evidence that would stand up in court for something HE said on here. Apparently he believes you can only be an old racist fuck if it would stand up in court.

Because it relies on the subjective opinion of the "tagger". Take out the subjectivity and it becomes relevant - but xG doesn't exist without it...