Weston Super Saint

Prime real estate in Central London, would certainly make someone very happy.

According to the article you posted, the treatment is used when people are struggling in intensive care once their immune system is compromised....

Oooppppssss https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-52779356

He should have a word with Boris

Not what I asked though was it? I'm aware of the term 'excess deaths' and understand the implications, merely asking where the 55k figure comes from - thank you MLG for providing the answer! Any response to question 2?

2 questions... 1. Where do you get 55,000 extra deaths from - the current figures are 36,042 in total aren't they? 2. Are you really suggesting that UK Government is responsible for 55,000 excess deaths?

You seem to have misunderstood the whole logic behind the lockdown. It was to stop the NHS from being overwhelmed, thus creating more deaths than necessary. If we 'crack on as usual', even with a treatment as in the link, there is the distinct possibility that the NHS would become overwhelmed once the rate of infection rises again....

#classicshirley - once again showing your narcissistic side and throwing personal insults. You should seek help from a professional regarding your narcissism as you're clearly not well, pal.

Lol. Turkish is all over the place. The more he posts, the more it is absolutely clear that he doesn't, probably never has, believed in any god of any kind. His sole purpose on this thread is to be as obnoxious as possible to MLG to continue to try and wind him up. If MLG says something is white, Turkish will say it's black just for the sake of the argument. That's 'mental'.

Worse than that surely, otherwise why would 'Hell' exist? If God created man, knowing how he would live his life, then why the need to punish people in Hell for something he has pre-ordained?

Some have evidence freely available in the public domain to determine their size

Yeah, bloody Tory ******s, made a right **** up of controlling the virus in the first place, them and their so-called scientific advisors, they should all be taken outside and shot. Oh, wait, hang on......

That's not what I was asking though, was it? I was asking why it's mental to ask for DNA evidence that something existed. That's completely different to your and MLG's discussion about Adam and Eve (that you've still not answered, but hey, I guess there is no answer on that one). So, once again, why is it mental to ask for DNA evidence that something existed? After all, there is DNA evidence for everything else that has ever existed. Or are you going to continue with your classic 'Turkish' and deflect once more and hurl some insults?

North Somerset council stated at the weekend that all public toilets would remain closed - presumably in the vain hope of disuading the Brummies from visiting. The local news reported they were all open - and accepting the 20p a go - yesterday. Never shy away from making a few quid do NS Council

Why is it mental? There is DNA evidence for dinosaurs that roamed the Earth thousands of years before these 'Giants / Sons of God' are alleged to have been around. Surely they would also have left some sort of trace of their existence? It would only be 'mental' if you knew they didn't exist, otherwise it's a pretty legitimate question isn't it?

Mental! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-52742519 Give 'em an inch....

Really, where?

Indeed. The discussion started because it was stated that we had signed 'something', got in a strop because we signed it, changed our minds and then 'signed' something else. It was only the resident Narcissist that brought the WA into the discussion. Presumably he forgot that we've only signed the WA once.... He then decided to try and cover his tracks and claim some pony about bad faith, despite the fact that both the UK and EU are honouring the WA - which as he himself points out is the only legally binding document.

Nope. Apparently it's more of a 'time' issue.... Far easier to ignore it though and hope it goes away.

Why would I do that, I've already stated he was. Pull your pants up, pal, you're still all over the place.

And yet you did! And in the process managed to get your own arguments all confused and pulled your own pants down. Top work!

So, which 'something' is it that the UK has signed up to, then got in a strop because they signed up to it and signed up to something else?

It woud be nice if you stopped editing your posts - or if you managed to get your arguments straight before you posted them

So let me try and understand what you are arguing.... October 2019, Withdrawal Agreement drawn up with the EU subject to ratification by the HoC October 2019, WA stalled in HoC and put on hold Nov and Dec 2019, election campaign and subsequent election Jan 2020, HoC ratifies the WA Jan 2020, UK and EU sign the withdrawal agreement as previously written up in October 2019 and had absolutely no changes made to it at all. Where is the bad faith between the UK and EU if they both signed the agreement that they put together in the first place? Surely the bad faith is between Boris and the UK electorate?

I see you've edited your original post. My response is in reply to your original, unedited version as quoted.