Holmes_and_Watson

Exclusive

It's not crossing your mind why you're the only person who wants to reach your destination? 🙂

You'll feel silly when you see the biography of Wernher Von Musk and a history of the Song Musk dynasty, in the bookshop. 🙂

For a small fee, the FA Editor is available. - MLG

Just imagining the screams of outrage if a "You have been expelled from the play offs" screen appeared. 🙂

Excellent work. Hopefully not following in the family tradition, like Uncle Harry, and getting their art teacher to cheat for them. 🙂

When loons collide. Thinking of all the players who make various religious signs entering the pitch, or when scoring. Considering they will all get beaten at some point, or have poor games, do they feel disappointed that their deity hasn't backed them? Should the authorities be investigating deities fixing match results? Also noted that the Beeb chooses to link a conservative Christian group with broader removal of support for Stonewall. Companies removed support from Stonewall because of their money grabbing overreach that would have companies breaking equality and employment law.

We could combine this thread with the FM27 one. The FA just has to allow us to "reload" any game we don't do as well as we'd like in. 🙂

There's a thread about getting a shooting coach. Is that thread redundant, if we can just get a winning coach? 🙂

5 wins in 7 for Russ. Walsall had a single shot on target Smallbone getting up to speed. Giddy times at the King Power.

Oh that's the private eye podcast. I see it mentioned in the mag. Surely an investigation due on why everyone on there acts and speaks as if they're Hislop's love children. 🙂

People asked Lawrie Mac what the "Bree Requirement" was, at the heart of his transfer dealings. He knew to only sign vastly experienced internationals, to make sure even a back up right back signing, would be a top class one. 🙂

Good to hear about a sequel

Tom Fellows reporting to the shooting range takes on a darker tone. 🙂

I heard that about the likes of Seville. But to still give them jobs and contracts? There must be a way of politely declining to hire a presenter, without letting them know what you think of them. "We're moving the format in a new direction, you rapist scumbag." Hmmm, it is tougher than I thought. Definite urge to hold them to account.

Tsk. The forum lets in any riff raff these days. 😃

£15 from Argos.

I might not have been listening closely to the bit I bothered with (because, eeeeewwwww) but there was a moment I thought they were at least within earshot of each other. For extra creepiness.

Thanks for adding what I should have."eventually" wasn't as good as pointing out that he adapted to the new role. He wasn't out of place doing it. We just had to wait longer for some crosses, as he had to run further up the park. 🙂

I thought he started fine with us. He could be a player and get crosses in. Like you say, not with much to aim at. I thought his finishing could get better. He would take on a shot and I thought he'd done okay in that department in previous clubs. He got moved into a wing back role, and his form eventually dipped in a poor side under Still. It's never returned from that. With Larin, I thought he'd be a good fit. But we don't really play that way, and Matsuki has proven to be more useful to how Tonda does want us to set up. There's nothing to stop Tonda having a fall back system, where we do need a physical presence in the box and wide players to cross into that. It would have been handy to break down Preston.

I've not followed the trial in depth. But I was curious, with low conviction rates, what questions the jury were asked to decide upon for the verdicts. With historical allegations, there's little to no forensic evidence. From the questions, you can see what the defence would call "public trawling" for more incidents is important. The various victim testimony builds up a pattern of actions and behaviour. The reinforcement of predatory behaviour; the personality shift moving consensual encounters into rape. All supported by a wide selection of witnesses who can confirm that behaviour. This is for a well known figure. Looking at the questions it's a reminder of how difficult it can be, if there's not a number of victims, and not a lot of people who can talk about the behaviour, and incidents, to secure a conviction. https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/crime/russell-brand-trial-close-jury-wife-b3076395.html

Revolutionary.

Conglomerate

Surely, if we want a mobile right back, who can play wing back, has over 100 top division appearances and is an available, full international... We just get Sugawara back from loan.

Easily fixed...