Jump to content

INFLUENCED.COM

Members
  • Posts

    2,481
  • Joined

Everything posted by INFLUENCED.COM

  1. Absofukinlutely on your last point but on the first I believed it was 'lawyers' that had reviewed that position ?
  2. I am sure you will find they want the right to appeal against further point deductions, already passed the proof of funds stage, if aware of a ten point deduction would you proceed knowing it could, if they wanted it to be, a 25 point reduction ?
  3. As pointed out earlier, he did believe the reasons valid, probably before he realised he was shooting himself/BT in the foot by doing so.
  4. So again everything points toward the FA being the problem, MLT has said so, TL has said so, Fry has said so and my mum has repeated it, I think it is safe to say by now that the arguement is not re -10 but leaving themselves open to -25 without the right to appeal. Are the Swiss or A N Other gonna accept that 'deal' just to own the club ? Will Saltz's group take on the poison chalice knowing they will not be accountable when we are in league two for the 10/11 season and build up from there ? Chancers don't throw this kind of money around, do they ?
  5. Matty, Lynham, Fry the FL. None of you are exempt Fook me another 'fan' looking to blame the one person who, if it were not for his actions, would have seen our club languishing in the third division 10 years ago, strange the thought processes of some, even stranger you put his name ahead of so many others in the blame game !
  6. So why does MLT lose respect if he has seen proof of funds ? So why does MLT lose respect full stop ! I think i'd still have a respect for him if he killed my wife(even greater maybe) MLT states it is the FA who are screwing the Pinnacle bid, Lynam states it si the FA but is trying to remain on side, rightly or wrongly, if the FA are trying to leave us, yes us, the club, without any rights of appeal against starting the season on -25 then every bidder/buyer will come up against the same, so do we concede now or try and negotiate with the bastards so we start on -10 ? MLT should not lose the respect of any Saints fan, irrespective
  7. MLT loses your respect, really ? honestly ? how do you feel about the guy charged with finding a buyer, carrying out due diligence and entering into an exclusivity period after seeing proof of funds ? how is his credibility ?
  8. Is the information you hold that bad ??
  9. I have every faith in MLT and his intentions, however, MF is Lynam's link not MLT's so would assume Lynam knows more in that respect
  10. Conflicts with other information posted on here and stated by Lynam
  11. Why would YOU be offended ?
  12. Whats the difference between Alex Ferguson and Michael Jackson...? Ferguson will be playing Giggs in August
  13. Where do Sky get that from then ? does go on to say wages will be paid after a second read but misleading all the same. Do some of his associates need to be named to stamp out further questioning over his ability to see this through ? if he has a bit of fold but some pals with a load of fold then great, it has been suggested Fry has identified proof of funds so are we just worrying needlessly ? 'they' have spent a 7 figure sum already so are we worrying needlessly ? Irrespective, staff need to be paid wages so...Pinnacle, Swiss, Fry lets get these guys paid and argue with the FA another day
  14. "Fialka, who helped to fund the payment of staff wages at Southampton this week" From the link to sky, have staff been paid then ?
  15. But this guys just 'fronting', hopefully those he represents have the same intent and we will reap the rewards
  16. Would have been good to know from the off exactly who/what we were dealing with, do we want a repeat of anything similar to events of the last 5 years ?
  17. Should have said investors, apparently
  18. As has been said many times before, the company was structured many years before this ruling came out, about 7 I believe, do not hail Lowe as that much of a visionary
  19. Public information is exactly that, if it can be used to qualify people then I would question why hasn't those closer to events done the same ? is this guy 'fronting' for someone else ? think Lynam needs to disclose another one of his 'gentleman' to settle the waters, or not
  20. Anyone who suggests they are more encouraged by this disclosure imo is lying
  21. Which we still will not have but everything else would be good
  22. On the Money Man on Sky thread, The Farmer says consortium, Lynam in his statement says one of the gentleman....its a consortium
  23. It is a consortium, apparently
  24. mmm interesting one, any one know to what extent he is 'in property'
×
×
  • Create New...