Jump to content

INFLUENCED.COM

Members
  • Posts

    2,481
  • Joined

Everything posted by INFLUENCED.COM

  1. The Usual Suspects
  2. The Lying King
  3. There will be Blood
  4. You're hired
  5. How much do you charge BTF
  6. Of course its hourly, who would work for that daily !!
  7. Could never have matched the offer from DP
  8. Noticed the ref and Steve Grant were on first name terms ??
  9. I hear Madonna has first shout on Harvey
  10. Posts highlighting the home teams cheating lead me to the conclusion that we were robbed !!
  11. Lets hope MO reads your link and elects a different course of action i.e putting the record straight on here, open letter, statement...whatever will, as much as you can, put the rumour to bed, seems LM was in the firing line more than MO, is it guilt by association ?
  12. Would that warrant legal action ? suggesting someone may want a cut, saying they took a cut would be different, appreciate I may have missed other posts, in which MO may have grounds, as posted above hardly worth the effort, i'd post to simply dismiss any allegations that were made highlight the posters talking out of their arse as I believe his brother has done, if thet persist then take whatever action necessary...would be a shame if this site were penalised due to a few with incorrect information.
  13. No time like the present, put down the mail and go find his office
  14. Millbrook Rugby Club ?
  15. On-line credit checks would offer an indication of working capital, please tell me under these circumstances there is a thorough investigation into proof of funds oppose to logging onto experian
  16. He gets paid, irrespective of who he spends his time with
  17. 12M ? come on Phil tell us what you know about the figure and why that which was on the table has not been formalised into a bid or has it ? or..well I dunno..just tell us something more
  18. That said and having had dealings with Jackson before surely he needs a rocket if he has allowed these guys to sit around the table, Dubai Phil kinda makes reference to the Fry F uck up on another thread, hey ho typical tho.
  19. ok - mention it once more !
  20. Nor is Marc Jackson, allegedly
  21. You know who they bought it off so why not just tell us all and what, you believe, the link to us is
  22. 1. Is it not the case that he will have no control over the money generated from this event ? 2. Again, is it because the revenue generated is going toward repaying the local business man who generously got us out of the cart(temporarily) and Fry's primary interest is to the creditors ? but thought future owners would be interested as by default it would reduce their liabilities
  23. As with most loans that risk is apparent, is there any reason why such an appeal as above can not be made, the Echo should get involved as the disclosures of this week have added to the mind set, if it were me I'd shout from the highest rooftop I trumped up 400k for SFC to survive in the short term please fans of the club help me to get my money back by attending SMS for this event
  24. But this game was never going to generate 400k, if he loaned SFC 400k then he is one of SFC's creditors and a new owner will assume the debt, it is a shame that this game has been so poorly received, why not try and remarket it disclosing the intent of the game..the lender appealing to the fans that he would like his very generous actions reciprocated by fans attendance
  25. Refunded if the game does not go ahead agreed, nowhere does it suggest if the money is no longer needed will all who attended get a refund..after the event why would anyone want one ?
×
×
  • Create New...