Ludwig

The game's steam-only this year, so that requirement will be there for all versions afaik.

Would at least be worth linking back to where you got it from. It otherwise propogates false myths that you're some kind of oracle on FM (as demonstrated by the 'will this affect this question below), when in reality, you're a researcher and have little authority over others to answer such questions.

Nice copying and pasting there.

Unlikely, seeing as their other strikers are either crap (for them)/unproven (Garner) and Sordell is literally their only vaguely reliable attacking outlet at the moment. Maybe in January, but most likely not on loan with a view to a perm.

How populous is pretty much the whole South of London? The same is the case in the PL. No South-West, South, or South-East (but more southern than London) have any PL representation whatsoever. East Midlands is pretty starved too.

Infinite solutions, unless we specify that x,y,z are non-zero integers. Also, Fermat's Last Theorem was for the case x^n + y^n = z^n for n>2, the case of n=3 was proven long before Wiles, a proof using infinite descent is pretty straightforward.

Danny Wilson would be perfect.

There are clear inconsistencies within player ratings within a squad, as I assume the Burnley researcher will have done Jack Cork, a Dutch researcher De Ridder etc. and their CAs will be a fair amount higher than some members of our squad (particularly Lallana, Fonte), when in reality this clearly isn't the case. Were I you, I'd have boosted them in a relative sense, that'd at least see Lallana on a par with Cork (something which presumably won't be the case, from your comments).

*Seaborne

Seabourne going the other way?

For a minute there, I thought we'd signed Jermaine Pennant.

Really?

Could be a very astute signing.

It was a course offered by the school to only the most gifted pupils, purely because they were a lot more demanding than A Levels, both in the sense that the summative assessment was on one exam (taken at the end of two years) and one piece of coursework (more like a mini-dissertation, than usual courseworks) and because the course was much harder. More than a credible alternative to A levels.

I reckon Cork will be the only one with CA anywhere near this.

6 people in the year below me (the year having just got their final results - at a state comprehensive school) did the Economics pre-U, two of those are going to Oxford, one to Cambridge, one to LSE, one to Bristol and another to medical school at UCL. On top of doing 3 (or 3 and a half) A Levels, it's hardly a way of 'hiding' for weak independent schools, based on the people I know who've taken it and the way in which it's packaged to schools like my old one.

I really hate how derby games are scheduled at some ridiculous times. I've got a save where a Saints Pompey game had a 5pm KO time! How unrealistic, I hope SI sort this out for the next version. Almost spoils the game for me.

If you read the thread, you'll be aware that he's applying for Medicine. Definitely no career prospects with that option...

I agree, since A*s began being put into offers (multiple courses asking for 2A*s), the equivalence level seems fair. Before that, however, asking for 42 (some Oxbridge colleges) when A level students were being asked for AAA, was wholly unfair.

Had a friend last year who got four rejections, only one interviewed him. Ended up with 4As (maths, bio, chem, english lit). 4 offers this year. Good luck for next year, Medicine is a lottery, but with grades in the bag, you'll probably have a winning ticket.

Which will probably be have increased in the latest version if his potential has improved in the eyes of the Burnley researcher (I'd put a lot of money on the fact that he has). Whereas Maynard probably hasn't had an increase in his PA, having been injured for too long, the researcher unable to justify any potential PA rise as a result.

The problem comes when we consider physics to be our metaphysics. To claim that science irrefutably demonstrates 'what there is', would lead to the scientist being right in attacking the religious 'way of viewing reality' (for if we know what reality is ('what there is') and can show it to be incompatible with what another claims it is, then we can dispense with that view). Unfortunately, the scientific method can bear little claim to irrefutable proof, though this doesn't seem to stop many people believing that it does and making fallacious dispensations of the claims of religion.

Because the site itself provides all the information, as opposed to input from users. The site is to blame if it was wrong, as opposed to the particular user providing the information.

Met him the other day. True story.

Manchester United sold Ronaldo. Arsenal will sell Fabregas. Barcelona sold Figo. Every player has his price, we certainly didn't buckle immediately, and if the reported fee is true, we're just keeping in line with our competitors (Manure, Arsenal, Barca...).