trousers

Python

@jackcork1: Great signing for us! Jay is a great player and will be great for us! Will be good to have my mate back and play in the same team again!

@TomCoull: New Forest? Nah, I've never been there. Limewood Hotel? No, not heard of that. Black jacket with a red stripe? No, don't own one of them...

@TomCoull: **EXCLUSIVE** Jay Rodriguez first Saints interview is now exclusively on Saints Player - http://t.co/m4ua3mmF #saintsfc

Cracking signing. Onwards and upwards. I may have to revise my "Saints to finish in the top 8" prediction at this rate....

Alaska

Is God a socialist?

Alive and well on Facebook

Because Pompey are a law unto themselves

I'll give you £100k for a fortnight. Your place or mine?

I'm sat here reading this thread thinking: "Three years ago we were contemplating trips to Dagenham and Redbridge and now we're debating whether there is a transfer tussle between ourselves and Everton for one of the country's potential top strikers". Ain't life grand :-)

Maybe. Maybe not

If we're not his preferred choice then we should move on to the next target IMO.

What dish was he making for his main course? Humble pie...?

Was asking the same thing above about another entry in that table (http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?14620-Pompey-Takeover-Saga&p=1383845#post1383845) Does anyone know the difference between the two columns? My guess is the "Statement of Affairs" column is the position as the administrator saw it when he first took control of the club (i.e. what was in the club's accounts at the time) and the "Proof of debt" column is what the creditors have subsequently claimed for (and have provided evidence to back up said claim). Maybe? If that's right, it would be interesting to total up the two columns and see what the difference is....

It's referring the 2010 'version' of PFC, not the current incarnation... i.e. those owed money under CVA1 The CVA1 figure usually quoted is the £16.5m one. But CVA2 lists a figure of £24.5m for CVA1 under the 'proof of debt' column

What could they possibly want to hide.....?

Oops...."The link could not be found"

According to today's PKF CVA doc, they (PKF) have currently racked up over £1m in administration costs....(if I've read the doc correctly)

Just noticed this in the list of creditors: Name.........................................................................Statement of Affairs.....Proof of Debt........Address Portsmouth City Football Club Limited (In Liquidation)......16,500,000.00..............24,435,795.32......C/o Baker Tilly, 25 Farringdon Street, London, EC4A 4RB What does that mean? That BT are claiming more under CVA1 than is actually on 'the books'?

Is that referring to the alleged 'creative inflation' of the number and/or amount of creditors under CVA1 by "you know who"? And that they are now trying to reduce that to gain an advantage in the voting for CVA2....?

A misleading headline by the BBC if I ever saw one.... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18370604 Bid accepted? Accepted by whom exactly?

Any idea why the Parachute Payments wording in the CVA proposal doc is written in such a non-definitive fashion? "According to the company's books and records"....? Why word it like that? Surely a quick check with the Premier League would tell Birch the exact figure due? Why the element of doubt?

Of course not....who would suggest such a thing....?