trousers

Can one assume that you'll be following up the other 438 threads and posts on here over the last 2 years that also qualify under this criteria?

Can one assume that you'll be following up the other 438 threads and posts on here over the last 2 years that also qualify under this criteria?

+ Dyer ?

+ Dyer ?

Private Message facility?

Private Message facility?

I was "simply" referring to the post-match comments from the Preston manager who said that his team effectively weren't trying in the first half, i.e. they weren't playing with anywhere near the 'form' that had taken them to 4th place. There is a difference between a team playing poorly because the opposition makes them poor and a side playing poorly because they are having an off-day. So, my 'simple' observational query was...did we stifle Preston or did they stifle themselves?

I was "simply" referring to the post-match comments from the Preston manager who said that his team effectively weren't trying in the first half, i.e. they weren't playing with anywhere near the 'form' that had taken them to 4th place. There is a difference between a team playing poorly because the opposition makes them poor and a side playing poorly because they are having an off-day. So, my 'simple' observational query was...did we stifle Preston or did they stifle themselves?

Is tomorrow's "pivotal" SLH board meeting still taking place?

Is tomorrow's "pivotal" SLH board meeting still taking place?

No idea if this has already been asked on this thread or elsewhere, as not had chance to catch up with post-match comments, yet, but how much influence did Preston's reported poor performance have on the result? Obviously I don't want to detract from a good result (honest!) but would we still have beaten an in-form Preston?

But on the bright side, we'll have Tommac, HelpmeRhonda and LifeLongSaint back with us (if the club was to enter administration any time soon) IMHO of course

The 1st half team that started against Ujpest would tend to back up this theory....

Proof?

Indeed.... www.nasa.gov

Aye, hilarious

Was it caramel or mint? The mint ones are pretty awful to be fair to Beatts.

If it was so obvious to Wotte that we needed to change tactics from "Poortvliet's" dogmatic system, then why did it take him 6 months to do something about it? As per the original OS articles when he and Poortvliet joined the club last summer, he had a remit which gave him influence on first team strategy. If he deserves credit for today's performance (which I don't doubt) then he also deserves equal criticism for keeping shtum for so long. IMHO of course.

Nah...can't be the march...Wotte said that marching and protesting affected the team's performance....

I think that's what is known in the trade as the crux of the matter

They were brought in as a seamless management team....

5-2 victory against Ujpest? (Obviously I can't be 100% sure as the club chose not to report on the game for some unknown reason.....)

must have missed the bit where they have claimed recently that they would not be interested if certain major shareholders weren't on the scene...