Matthew Le God

How is that relevant?

The London 2012 Olympic Stadium will have 55,000 temporary seats. It is likely to be reduced from 80,000 to a 25,000 stadium after 2012. Although even with 36k and 9k temporary seats after the World Cup Pompey will never get close to 36k once the temporary seats have been removed.

Swapping Bale and Surman would make more sense.

Chris Sutton makes a terrible start to his managerial career with that as his first signing

SAF said he'd invest and he didn't. This new guy is invisible to professional journalists who can't find anything about him let alone how much he is worth.

.........................

From The Times No journalist can find anything about this guy so why are Pompey fans so happy? No one has any idea how wealthy or not he is.

Something is not "right" with all this. SAF sold his shares for £0 after having them for 40 days. People don't become rich in business doing things like that. Also no matter how much money the new owner puts into the club he will never make it back let alone a profit. Man City and Chelsea can support high crowds and already have large stadia. Pompey have huge debts, a poor stadium and poor attendances 3k below a 20k capacity and a team requiring massive investment just to get 17th. How this will ever turn into a return on investment I don't know. It will take £50 million just to get them safe from administration problems and debt clearance, add to that the cost of a new stadium upwards of £50m, £9m for training complex and we haven't even started on the team yet. Is it worth it for the money 17,000 fans will bring?

Something is not "right" with all this. SAF sold his shares for £0 after having them for 40 days. People don't become rich in business doing things like that. Also no matter how much money the new owner puts into the club he will never make it back let alone a profit. Man City and Chelsea can support high crowds and already have large stadia. Pompey have huge debts, a poor stadium and poor attendances 3k below a 20k capacity and a team requiring massive investment just to get 17th. How this will ever turn into a return on investment I don't know. It will take £50 million just to get them safe from administration problems and debt clearance, add to that the cost of a new stadium upwards of £50m, £9m for training complex and we haven't even started on the team yet. Upwards of £110 million before any players have been signed and potentially CHampionship football next year. Is it worth it for the money 17,000 fans will bring?

Something is not "right" with all this. SAF sold his shares for £0 after having them for 40 days. People don't become rich in business doing things like that. Also no matter how much money the new owner puts into the club he will never make it back let alone a profit. Man City and Chelsea can support high crowds and already have large stadia. Pompey have huge debts, a poor stadium and poor attendances 3k below a 20k capacity and a team requiring massive investment just to get 17th. How this will ever turn into a return on investment I don't know. It will take £50 million just to get them safe from administration problems and debt clearance, add to that the cost of a new stadium upwards of £50m, £9m for training complex and we haven't even started on the team yet. Is it worth it for the money 17,000 fans will bring?

What is your point? It is based on splitting the number of teams in half with 50% of the southern most teams in one section and the rest in the northern section. It will of course vary from year to year where the north/south divide is due to different teams being in the competition due to promotion and relegation.

Arizona clearly watches a different game to the rest of us.

Yep exactly that

Is that why FM09 was the biggest selling game of the series and top of the UK PC game charts for 22 weeks? And as for your point about speed FM10 will be significantly quicker to play compared to FM09 Speed tests have been carried out and show... Full match detail – a speed increase between Football Manager 2010 and Football Manager 2009 (fully patched) of 16%. Quick match detail – a speed increase between Football Manager 2010 and Football Manager 2009 (fully patched) of 43.5%

It is a football management game, what else are you expecting? The fundamentals aren't going to change it so much into becoming Halo or The Sims! Does FM09 have backroom advice system of FM10? No it doesn't. Does FM09 have a tactics wizard? No it doesn't. Does FM09 have stadiums, fans, weather effects, the over 100 new animations of FM10? No it doesn't Does FM 09 have the massively improved and accurate match engine of FM10? No it doesn't etc etc etc

.................

So you base your decision on other peoples reviews rather than playing the demo? Those videos show the game has made significant changes to certain modules and you are just trying to find things to be negative about.

5 new tutorial videos Finances Player interaction Transfer part 1 Transfer part 2 Backroom advice Scouting

FM10 will be significantly quicker to play compared to FM09 Speed tests have been carried out and show... Full match detail – a speed increase between Football Manager 2010 and Football Manager 2009 (fully patched) of 16%. Quick match detail – a speed increase between Football Manager 2010 and Football Manager 2009 (fully patched) of 43.5%

It will be former Southampton player Scott Bevan. 7 years a Saint 1997-2004 and Southampton born and bred.

Morgan is still injured and not in the squad. Lallana is injured and not in the squad. And you call others retarded for not knowing stuff! You look a tad silly now

We will put out a much stronger team out than that as Pardew stated and the matchday squad on the OS suggests. Plus Jacob Mellis is on England duty.

Oliver Lancashire won't play right back.

Exactly what I said then