Matthew Le God

When it comes to the question... 'Do you believe in a god' what do you think the options are?

Why is it laughable?

When it comes to the question... 'Do you believe in a god' what do you think the options are?

You are still unable to grasp the basics of what an atheist and theist is. Atheist = not believing in a god. It doesn't require a choose to be made. There are two option... 1) You belief in a god or gods 2) You don't believe in a god or gods There is no 3rd option. So yes, you are ignorant of the basics of this discussion.

Which makes all babies atheist. Not believing in a god = atheist. You are bringing 'disbelief' into it when that is irrelevant.

My previous answer to Turkish one post up explains.

This post just further highlights your ignorance on this topic. Theism and atheism is a binary choice of belief in a god, there is no 3rd option! You either believe in a god (theist) or you do not believe in a god (atheist). Every baby there has ever been does not believe in a god so is an atheist. Agnosticism deals with knowledge... not belief. It is not a third option when it comes to belief. Agnosticism is a subset of both atheism and theism.

Atheist = not holding a belief in god Babies do not have a belief in God = every baby there has ever been is/was an atheist The indoctrination and brainwashing happens when children are older.

Cameraperson #StayWoke

Like every other person on the planet you were born an atheist. Babies are not Christian, Muslim etc as the indoctrination and brainwashing happens later in life. How have you determined it to be impossible for you to become an atheist for a second time?

It isn't 'extra', all players are expected to follow fitness programmes over the summer.

1) What problem are you claiming he is an equal part of? 2) Why is it nonsense to think some players in a squad are better than others? Is Danny Ings in the same class of striker as Shane Long? Ings and Ward-Prowse are our best players. 3) On what is that based?

They have not announced an extension to his contract. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/57618624

A cheap solution...

You follow me...

Hard to believe that it is the true reason. Saints kept on smaller players from the same cohort. If they didn't think they'd be big enough for one role, they could find a different role for them. Plus the medical department would have been fully aware they could grow taller after the age of 16 when released.

Norwich conceded 75 goals the last time they were in the Premier League.

That is appalling 'journalism'. That article is simply rehashing Noel Whelan talking to the terrible website Football Insider. There is no news in the article.

Hilarious! 🙄 Explain why it isn't a valid question.

Why do you appear to value open play involvements higher than set piece goal involvements? A goal is a goal regardless of it being in open play or from a set piece.

Not at all, imagine someone else asked you the question... and then give answering a question a try for once.

Play the post, not the poster. It wasn't an unreasonable question.

Why would you ignore them? Do those set piece goals and assists not count as goals and assists? He is exceptional at them and that is a skill that has value.

Why are you seemingly using that as a negative? It is to his credit he is superb at them, being good at them boosts his value. A goal or an assist from a set piece can win a game just like one from open play can.