Matthew Le God

Liebherr was not a Saints fan when he bought the club. He became one afterwards. The vast majority of current Premier League owners were not a fan of their club before their takeovers.

I was 9 years old when he died.

So what?

Saints can still finish 17th to 12th (technically 11th is also possible)... so there is a lot of money riding on it... circa £10m in prize money. That could make a big difference for us in the summer.

If that is supposed to be 'funny'... it isn't funny and it is moronic. If it isn't supposed to be funny it is moronic. Grow up and join the 21st century 🙄

Varying the comment depending on gender is what makes it sexist. Using shopping to her was highlighting a stereotype you are surely aware of and should know the connotations.

He is right though... your comment was sexist.

Whenever you read my posts play this in the background... I'm the fastest pedant in the West!

Can something without substance be fucked up?

This thread has been lacking substance of any kind since it started. The thread has rumbled on for 17 pages without anything credible happening in the public eye.

Four... with a cherry on top! 😇

How about calling women 'chicks'?

Prove it! 😜

@Convict Colony You have got very confused with the context of each of those quotes and what they were responding to! - The first quote you've used of mine their is regarding the Sun article. My claim was the Sun article 'doesn't prove they would prevent him from owning the club now'. That is undeniably correct as it makes no mention of it. - The second quote is regarding you thinking the Insider Sport article defeats me saying the Sun article doesn't prove what you claim. That is a compete red herring and is irrelevant. If the second article is evidence he would be prevented, that has no relevance to my claim the first article doesn't.

I'm distantly related to Benny Hill, doesn't mean I've ever spoken to him.

I haven't done that at all. Show me an example of that.

That post of mine was in reference to the Sun article and I'm clealry right regarding that statement I made as the Sun article does not prove they would prevent him owning the club. So I'll ask again... What claim I've made in this thread do you think has been defeated with that link from Insider Sport?

Is the wink due to you being aware of the 25 goal swing in goal difference required?

What claim I've made in this thread do you think has been defeated with that link?

I did not say that. Plus a hypothetical of 'is player X better than having no player at all in that position?' really is not a question worth asking. As it is beyond obvious! 🙄

One mistake for the goal doesn't outweigh everything else a player does in a match. This is how you get fans writing off a player as they focus on the limited number of mistakes they make rather than all the good things a player does during the rest of the 90 minutes. I certainly don't want Stephens as a first choice starter for us, but as a 4th choice centre back he is a good option in the squad and we'd struggle to find a better 4th choice option.

It is blindingly obvious having Taylor as a left back is better than having no left back at all. But when you do a team of the season for the 2020/21 season, Bertrand was our left back for that season. Not sure why this is hard to grasp.

Really not the best source and that article doesn't prove that they would prevent him from owning the club now.

Crystal Palace currently losing... Saints are looking good for a 13th or 12th place finish.

On what grounds?