Matthew Le God

Vardy doesn't need replacing this summer. They could persuade Ings to see out his contract and get him for free next summer.

If Newcastle win both games and Saints draw both... we'd be level on 45 points and Saints currently have the better GD.

Technically Barnsley aren't new to the Premier League... 😉

Barnsley... because they will likely be the weakest of the four in the playoffs.

Perhaps you shouldn't label an entire fanbase because of the decision of one person in a club's media department.

0 away fans allowed

Liebherr was not a Saints fan when he bought the club. He became one afterwards. The vast majority of current Premier League owners were not a fan of their club before their takeovers.

I was 9 years old when he died.

So what?

Saints can still finish 17th to 12th (technically 11th is also possible)... so there is a lot of money riding on it... circa £10m in prize money. That could make a big difference for us in the summer.

If that is supposed to be 'funny'... it isn't funny and it is moronic. If it isn't supposed to be funny it is moronic. Grow up and join the 21st century 🙄

Varying the comment depending on gender is what makes it sexist. Using shopping to her was highlighting a stereotype you are surely aware of and should know the connotations.

He is right though... your comment was sexist.

Whenever you read my posts play this in the background... I'm the fastest pedant in the West!

Can something without substance be fucked up?

This thread has been lacking substance of any kind since it started. The thread has rumbled on for 17 pages without anything credible happening in the public eye.

Four... with a cherry on top! 😇

How about calling women 'chicks'?

Prove it! 😜

@Convict Colony You have got very confused with the context of each of those quotes and what they were responding to! - The first quote you've used of mine their is regarding the Sun article. My claim was the Sun article 'doesn't prove they would prevent him from owning the club now'. That is undeniably correct as it makes no mention of it. - The second quote is regarding you thinking the Insider Sport article defeats me saying the Sun article doesn't prove what you claim. That is a compete red herring and is irrelevant. If the second article is evidence he would be prevented, that has no relevance to my claim the first article doesn't.

I'm distantly related to Benny Hill, doesn't mean I've ever spoken to him.

I haven't done that at all. Show me an example of that.

That post of mine was in reference to the Sun article and I'm clealry right regarding that statement I made as the Sun article does not prove they would prevent him owning the club. So I'll ask again... What claim I've made in this thread do you think has been defeated with that link from Insider Sport?

Is the wink due to you being aware of the 25 goal swing in goal difference required?