Matthew Le God

Information such as what exactly on takeovers?

I asked for recent examples of 29 year olds who have not succeeded previously outside of the Dutch league costing £30m+. You failed to provide any.

I think you'll struggle to find much Nixon was right and first on.

Where have you plucked that number from? He is on more than that per year, so why would his payoff be under 1 years salary when he has 3 years remaining?

How many 29 year old players can you name that have cost £30m recently from the Dutch league? 🤔

Our pressing system falls apart without attacking fullbacks, take an attacking one like KWP out and put in a defensive one in and it all unravels.

1) How do you know that? 2a) He'd need to be shown to exist before he can compete with someone 2b) It isn't hard to see the flaws in the 'intelligent design'. The veins in a giraffe's neck are not efficient, it is poor design if they poofed into existence and weren't a product of necks evolving to be longer over time.

1) Define average in the context you are using. 2) Where in the table do you think this squad should finish?

In the analogy he is both. 🙄

Holding onto someone's shirt isn't gaining a legal advantage. It is football, not Judo.

What reason is there to hold someone's shirt during a game apart from to trying to gain an advantage?

Our fanbase is a bit bigger than the 4 fans in the photos above.

Yet again you have shown you can't grasp that not believing something has met its burden of proof IS NOT the same as claiming it does not exist. I'm not sure how many times or how many ways I can explain this to you before you grasp this basic concept. But it remains an issue as you keep highlighting you don't get it.

Why are you so obsessed with my sex life? Hows yours? Is being someone who trolls pedants an attractive quality for any prospective partners of yours? On a vaguely related tangent... What is more likely... Jesus was born of a virgin to a deity. Or Mary had an affair and lied to Joseph?

Humans don't consciously make their own eyes. So your analogy again is nonsense. Plus see my point on the Adam and Eve unfair test in the previous post

Nonsense yet again Turkish. The test he set Adam and Eve was not a fair test. God knew before he set them the test that they would fail. How can a test be fair if the test designer knew 100% for certain they would not pass it? They had no free will as he designed them, he designed the test and there was no way they could win.

Oh dear Turkish! Your analogy is a mess and flawed. As you ignore/forget/avoid that God is both the architect and the bricklayer. Even if he was just the architect, he is an all knowing architect who knows the future and would be aware that his plans allow for the bricklayer to mess up but decides to stick with his instructions regardless. An even bigger fuck up of ineptitude!

If the design allows for mistakes to occur... then he fucked up and is inept at design.

How can a 100% kind and loving God be comparable with one that punishes his creations for not believing in them. Especially when he is aware of what proof would be needed for believe but opts for the 'best method to get his message across to be an old book that is poorly translated. Pretty inept!

A good competent designer wouldn't allow for faults. An all knowing all powerful god should be capable of having a perfect record... he fucked up and is inept if he designed it.

Some people claim the eye is perfect and is evidence of intelligent design. All it takes is one bad human eye to show this is nonsense.

Of course not, but an all powerful, all knowing and infallible God should be capable of being less inept at design.

Are you still unable to grasp that claims of 100% perfect are ruined by only 1 example that counters it?

Have you honestly met someone who believes in God but attributes him with no more than the definition you used? No moral system or anything?

Doesn't take a genius to spot the problems with the human eye. It is a long way from being a good system, if it was designed God is inept.