Jump to content

Matthew Le God

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    30,655
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matthew Le God

  1. 1) Your first sentence makes no sense what so ever as a reply to my post. I was pointing out to you that the archbishop was cherry picking from the scripture and leaving out the horrendous parts. 2) Name a conspiracy theory you think I believe in.
  2. Nope, even during the opening 20 minutes we had more of the ball and more shots.
  3. It was not a battering by Burnley in the first half. We had 67% possession and 14 shots in the 1st half. Sure we fucked up defensively for the two goals, but it was not a battering from Burnley like you claimed.
  4. Are you incapable of posting without attempts at petty, personal and inaccurate insults? 🙄
  5. Not sure how this helps you. Hardly a surprise that a CoE archbishop conveniently ignores the nasty bits of the book and rewrites the good bits to appeal to Church of England followers. CoE archbishop cherry picking shocker!
  6. Why? It was a foul by Walker-Peters, but him being fouled before should see it overruled. There was no reason for the Burnley player to have his hands on Walker-Peters apart from to gain an unfair advantage.
  7. I'd have taken off Armstrong and Walcott and replaced with Djenepo, Minamino or Tella to keep us on the front foot. And Ings off, Adams on.
  8. Switching to a three centre back system put us on the back foot and invited pressure. Should have stuck with the 4222, but it did ultimately see us win.
  9. That didn't keep the score down, hitting the post is an off target shot.
  10. Our wage offer isn't likely to be the issue. If a CL level team wants him, he'll likely go and you couldn't blame him getting a last big payday.
  11. No he didn't. Just because he gave away a penatly it doesn't outweigh all the positive offensive and defensive work he did. He was constantly stretching Burnley and was solid defensively.
  12. Battering would be controlling possession and peppering the goal with shots. Burnley were not doing that even during the time they were 2-0. By half time Saints had far more shots and 67% of possession.
  13. Could you not wait until full time before writing off the game and manager? The stats show it was Saints who did the battering, not Burnley.
  14. Perhaps try waiting until a game has finished before posting in this thread! 🙄
  15. Have you forgotten the last time we played them?
  16. @Turkish We've been rumbled!
  17. Why do you think a Saints player would be sent off for it vs Man City, but a Leicester City player wouldn't? It is screwing over Man City, not Leicester.
  18. Happy Ishtar @whelk @Turkish Predates Christianity by 4,000 years. Christians pinched it and infringed its copyright. 😉 If modern day magicians can con people, what could someone do 2,000 years ago...?
  19. Would you prefer them not to try?
  20. You know when you've been MLG'd 😉
  21. The 1970s called, it wants its misogyny back.
  22. Don't read the Guardian and watch the press conference instead. Hasenhuttl did not say Ward-Prowse is out...
  23. Not entirely. Who would you play as the second 'number 10' with Armstrong? Minamino, Redmond, Tella or Djenepo?
×
×
  • Create New...