-
Posts
30,664 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Matthew Le God
-
Harrison Reed - Official: Signs for Fulham
Matthew Le God replied to washsaint's topic in The Saints
-
Park
-
Final Barclays Manager of the Month - Choose Ralph
Matthew Le God replied to le_tiss's topic in The Saints
Have you been tested for that cough? Six in one post sounds persistent! -
Aren't jokes supposed to be funny? Which was my point with that tweet.
-
Turkish pretending to be itk
-
Sky's transfer centre have jumped the gun... https://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre
-
Sky's transfer centre have jumped the gun... https://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre
-
Final Barclays Manager of the Month - Choose Ralph
Matthew Le God replied to le_tiss's topic in The Saints
-
-
Harrison Reed - Official: Signs for Fulham
Matthew Le God replied to washsaint's topic in The Saints
Bayern Munich will get a % of the Hojbjerg fee. -
Harrison Reed - Official: Signs for Fulham
Matthew Le God replied to washsaint's topic in The Saints
Like Hojbjerg, Reed's contract also expires in 2021. If we can't get £20m for Hojbjerg we won't get it for Reed. -
Harrison Reed - Official: Signs for Fulham
Matthew Le God replied to washsaint's topic in The Saints
Not sure how you worked that out. You are jumping to conclusions that the terms of the loan mean Saints can't say no. -
You are going to pray(talk) to an invisible deity who you have a personal relationship with!?
-
I'm getting that framed regardless of context!
-
I've already told you that I'm happy to be shown to be wrong on this when I said... "If someone like @Raging Bull is able to provide good proof of the God he believes in then I would change my view. He hasn't come remotely close to doing so however and he seems oblivious to previous rebuttals to his claims and he uses circular arguments of using an old book to prove the claims of the same old book."
-
@Raging Bull Forget the Bible for a minute. Can you see why it is a problem to use a book that is not the Bible to justify the contents of the same book? For justification you need external confirmation. Now let's apply that to the Bible... you keep using the Bible to justify the contents of the Bible! You've never been able to provide external confirmation of the claims of the Bible. You always use a circular argument and that is deeply flawed.
-
Keeping Track of the Contracts 2024-25
Matthew Le God replied to Over land and sea's topic in The Saints
-
What away kit does have a relationship with the club? Would be pretty dull if we had a mainly yellow (and blue) away kit every season. No harm mixing it up. Plus the current one has blue and yellow on it. The yellow away kit obsession some Saints fans have appears to be largely down to the FA Cup win. Variety is the spice of life! You can't get more traditional that your first ever style of kit and our first ever style of kit is a sash. Again if we had red and white stripes every season it would get pretty boring and they'd be hard to sell. If selling shirts wasn't the motivation we'd have the exact same shirt for many years. No harm mixing up the style of the home shirt with stripes some years, 1980s style Keegan era shirts other years and a sash shirt occasionally.
-
Is that @Raging Bull and @whelk using the Bible to justify the Bible?
-
No they aren't. If someone like @Raging Bull is able to provide good proof of the God he believes in then I would change my view. He hasn't come remotely close to doing so however and he seems oblivious to previous rebuttals to his claims and he uses circular arguments of using an old book to prove the claims of the same old book.
-
-
You are correct! Some people in this thread keep stating I've said things I haven't. At no point did I say there is no afterlife... I said there is no good evidence to believe there to be an afterlife. Those two things are not the same. Same applies to God, I haven't said there is no God in this thread... I said there is no good evidence to believe in a God. I will say certain descriptions of God are bullshit because they are contradictory and can't be true. For example a 100% kind and loving God is not compatible with a God who endorses rape, genocide and slavery like the one of the Bible does.
-
Aston
-