Matthew Le God

'and vice versa' = whichever way round it was! As it didn't actually happen the flood water was neither salt or freshwater... because it is made up nonsense!

1) Can you direct me to where in the Bible says that not all of this should be taken literally? 2) Do you agree millions of people do take the Noah story literally? 3) Why would an intelligent God make it unclear which stories are supposed to be taken literally or not? Clearly he has failed making it clear as millions of people do take it literally. 1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion He clearly failed! As there is a huge amount of confusion over if you should beleive the Noah story is literal. Millions think you should.... millions think you shouldn't. So God ****ed up getting his message across without confusion!

My explanation coming from Wikipedia of want constitutes a scientific theory was correct. That is what a scientific theory is, the fact it came from Wikipedia doesn't make it wrong. Are you seriously denying that is an accurate representation of what it is? People often confuse general usage of 'theory' as just being a guess, but a'scientific theory' is not merely a guess, it is an explanation of something using demonstrable evidence.

You compared the changes of human's common ancestor with fish to human, with changes over a few days. That shows you lack understanding that small changes over hundreds of millions of years over a vast number of generations can lead to big differences and that it is not remotely the same as thinking a population of fish can alter significantly during a few days of rain.

Admitting defeat on your understanding of how huge changes are possible over 375,000,000 years but not possible over 40 days of rain? We can talk about the mass murder by god of the babies of Egypt if you want. Nice kind and loving god to do that isn't he? Those babies were completely innocent and he murdered them.

You are unable to explain why I am wrong. Give it a go! 375 million years = lots of time to evolve from fish to man 40 days of rain = not enough time for even one new generation of an animal, let alone for them to adapt from salt-water to freshwater It really is basic stuff here Turkish!

I'll try explaining this to you again... - humans common ancestor with fish was 375 million year ago - in 375 million years you have a vast amount of time for populations to change You appear to think 375 million years for chances to occur is comparable to animals changing during a few days of rain from salt-water to freshwater and back again. Can you really not see the difference between small changes in generations over 375 million years is vastly different from changes over 40 nights of rain?

You don't understand the basics of evolution. You have demonstrated that you don't today when you said it has an end point. I may be pedantic, boring, irritating... but on this you are just being dumb (and wrong... very wrong)!

That does not say all freshwater fish. Nor does it matter if I did say all. It is completely irrelevant to rebutting the point that many species cannot live in both... yet they all lived before, during and after the flood. Proving the flood did not happen.

My post pointed out the flaws in your answers.

It is 2020 and you don't understand the basics of evolution.

Unable to form a rebuttal?

1) I didn't say that. Even if I did, that doesn't remove the point that not all could survive which debunks the account in the Bible. 2) The Bible does not say it was localised. It also does not say do not take this literally. If god was intelligent he wouldn't want to create confusion over which bits actually happened and which are stories. 3) That does not explain where the water came from or went afterwards. 4) Bones structure is one of many differences. I didn't say it was the only one.

All it requires is you to acknowledge what you said was nonsense. 1) The eye is not an organism as you claimed 2) We know how the eye evolved from a few light sensitive cells to a pinhole camera style, to a human eye. All it requires is small changes over time. We have time, lots of time. The earth is more than 4.5 billion years old.

Would you ignore gods commandment about killing disobedient children? Won't he be ****ed off you ignored his commandment?

Plus still waiting on the evolution eye nonsense. Post #1702

It was you that used the word kill!

The 55k figure comes from the Office of National statistics. It compares deaths so far this year to previous years. So the figure is likely to be a lot higher than the 36k the government uses. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/19/almost-55000-excess-uk-deaths-during-covid-19-outbreak-says-ons

1) The contradiction is one of the commandments says don't kill and another one says kill disobedient children. That is a contradiction. They are in conflict with each other! They cannot both be followed as one breaks the other. That is what a contradiction is! 2) You've also ignored post #1702 on the nonsense you said about the evolution of the eye.

1) Can you not see how that contradicts the commandment to kill disobedient children? 2) So if a terrorist attacked you with a knife it would be wrong for a policeman to shoot and kill him? 3) I haven't changed the goalposts. You ignored my picking apart your nonsense about the evolution of the eye.

:mcinnes: and one for luck 1) The eye is not an organism 2) We know how the eye evolved from a few light sensitive cells to a pinhole camera style, to a human eye. All it requires is small changes over time. We have time, lots of time. The earth is more than 4.5 billion years old.

Have you ever been disobedient to your parents? The kind and loving god of the Bible says you should be stoned to death if you have.

Ball

Is Raging Bull going to agree the eye does not 'continue to plague the theory of evolution'? The diagram in #1685 shows its evolution from a collection of light sensitive cells, to a pin hole camera style to an eye ball. It happens in small steps over millions of years.

You shall not make yourself an idol Exodus 20:4-6