Matthew Le God

The rest of the post did (yet again) not provide an answer as to why a global flood was not a genocide. Babies died in that flood, those babies were not guilty of anything. Yet again, more nonsense. Many Christians claim the god of the Bible is 100% kind and loving. All it needs to disprove that is 1 line in the Bible of him being evil and it is not 100%.

The second point should read... 2) God ****s up creation by creating Adam & Eve and then giving them an unfair test that he knew before they took it that they would fail, so unfairly decides to punish them and humankind for

You yet again fail to explain how a global flood is not a genocide. If it is so simple it would take seconds of your time to explain. 1) A god who knows the future 2) God ****s up creation 3) God gets angry that he ****ed up creation so decides the only way he can start again is to commit a genocide drowning the global population so that a small group of people can commit incest and repopulate the planet 4) The new human population ****s up so god decides to send Jesus to be sacrificed to god to act as a loophole for a set of rules god created because he loves blood sacrifices What about that is an inaccurate summary?

Perhaps Liverpool hadn't been in for him at that point. In which case it isn't being dishonest.

Catholic!

What does that have to do with blasphemy or duck rape?

Additionally an explanation as to how it can be a fair test for Adam & Eve if you know they will fail it before they take it. Impossible for them to pass if god knew in advance they would fail. So God punishes them (and humankind) because he set them an unfair test!

Who wasn't honest?

I'm not wrong, as I wasn't making a claim... you were. I'm asking you to explain why the global flood was not a genocide by an evil god...

Stop making things up

You once said... "coronavirus is a hoax, no-one has died" Wow... it is easy to make up unsubstantiated bull**** and not provide evidence.

Lie Lie You don't understand what a contradiction is

Stop accusing people of not understanding then if you can't back it up. Contradictory statements are by definition not clear and require clarification as to which of them (if any) was the correct one.

Until you give an explanation... I don't believe you. You are fine with making accusations without evidence it seems! If the government gives contradictory statements then that is an issue. Both statements cannot be correct, so that requires clarification.

You are right, it is hard to understand an accusation of lack of understanding if it is not explained. Have you considered your understanding may be the issue?

It would have been until 4th April.

Waiting for Turkish to back up his accusations...

You accused me of not understanding something but refused to explain it. It suggests you have no answer. If you do... give it a go... if not... then stop accusing people of lacking understanding. It needs explaining because the government has given out contradictory advice from different ministers in recent days.

It is vague and wishy-washy... reminiscent to your lack of responses to questions in another thread

It would have been decided months ago.

I look forward to James Ward-Prowse free kicks vs socially distanced walls!

It doesn't show the home form is bad, it shows the ratio between home and away points. Not the same thing. (Yes I know the home record is bad)

Teams have played different numbers of games and different opponents so that does not work.

I hope you were wearing a mask when you coughed!

Solution...