Matthew Le God

Not a 1st team signing. Under 21s or a Valenciennes loan I think.

I think he is more if the level of our under 21s or Valenciennes rather than Göztepe.

If Bednarek really is wanted by AS Roma it highlights he really isn't a bad as many Saints fans make out.

They couldn't afford him until his contract expires.

I asked a question, I didn't make a statement. You can't agree with that question.

So none say Spurs are "confident of getting Dibling over the line this window". Which is what I asked for.

From which journalists? Or is it random Spurs fans?

You want to silence the free press? Is this 1933 Germany or 2025 America?

Devil's advocate... Only one year left on his contract (which impacts price) and he wants game time. He has been given the opportunity to join the Chelsea eco-system, which may see him get a return to London if things go well (very well).

Echo think potential fee is higher

How would you lose him from being 'around the club'? He is 'Football editor at The Sun'! A Cortese-style ban?

For those that missed it...

He could still put the same amount of hours and focus into the role as he would in England. A lot of the role is phone calls & meetings and you do not need to be on UK soil to do that.

Why couldn't it be done full time remotely and jetting in occasionally? He doesn't need to be at Staplewood every morning to hold meetings and restructure the football department. A lot of it could be done from anywhere in the world with a phone, laptop and internet connection.

£18m and probably not even that £18m yet as some might be based on things like appearances clauses that he hasn't met and won't ever meet if he leaves.

Perhaps Saints can't get a work permit sorted, so he is appointed by Sport Republic for the group and works for the group but based abroad.

We won a game We won a game away They will be panicking on the streets of Derby tonight!

Restricted to 10 minutes though!

Not great, but to be fair to him... he was out on loan in Turkey for one of those!

Nonsense. He said 'quite obviously bull' that he is injured, suggesting that he thinks the transfer rumour is the reason for his absence and that he is not injured. But his absence doesn't mean the injury is a lie, he could be both injured and have transfer interest. There does not need to be a lie.

My point being @S-Clarke didn't

It isn't particularly defensive. Back to high pressing again and fewer passes to get up the pitch.