-
Posts
30,637 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Matthew Le God
-
Bullshit, I know the role thanks. What a CEO is responsible for varies from club to club. Some core responsibilities apply across the board for all CEOs, but there are big differences across the role from club to club.
-
Asking for evidence someone is responsible for something does not mean you hold the position that you believe that they are not. Why are you not capable of grasping that?
-
You ignored the question (again) You continue to get the Chat GPT name wrong You suggested using AI to show that CEOs do have the same roles. I quoted from them that they do not show that. Turkish fail after Turkish fail!
-
I asked first.
-
Still waiting for an answer.
-
See my previous post.
-
Bullshit. Nothing in that post is me saying he was not at fault for the football this season. Asking for evidence someone is responsible for something does not mean you hold the position that you believe that they are not. So it is not me with a black and white view of the world, it is you as you can't see the middle position of withholding belief until evidence supports a position for or against!
-
Coventry’s rise from where they were when he took charge to the end of the season was pretty impressive.
-
I did not attack him, just his lies.
-
Well he mispresented what I said. So that makes it a strawman fallacy. You should know, you do it regularly enough! Do you think I said what he claimed? If so in what post?
-
How do you know Ankersen, Bitcon or Kraft for example weren't responsible for some of the things you are putting on Parsons?
-
Utter bullshit. Strawman fallacy. Misrepresenting what I've said. Show me a post of mine where I have "unequivocally said he was not responsible for the football on offer this season".
-
Ignored the question again. My point was CEOs do not have the same duties. You found that funny. Now you seem to agree they do. So what exactly are you disagreeing with now that you agree with my original point?
-
So you agree football CEOs don't do the same job! Well done. So what on earth are you disagreeing with!
-
The radio silence is deafening @Turkish
-
Still not taking your own advice! You said... "Plenty of places to look, Chat GBT, linkedin, even google. It really isn't hard." Chat GPT says Varying Duties (depending on club type): Sporting Oversight: At some clubs, the CEO is heavily involved in football matters (transfers, hiring managers), while others delegate this to a Director of Football or Sporting Director. Academy & Infrastructure Projects: Some CEOs are deeply involved in youth development or stadium expansions, especially at growing clubs. Community Engagement: Particularly at community-owned or smaller clubs, CEOs might also handle outreach and fan engagement directly. Examples: At Manchester United, the CEO (currently Omar Berrada, incoming from Man City) focuses on global strategy, revenue, and brand — with football decisions delegated. At a League Two club, the CEO might be more hands-on across all departments, including football operations. So in short: core leadership, financial, and strategic roles are standard, but the level of involvement in football decisions and daily operations varies significantly.
-
Try using your own advice!
-
You have completely missed my point! My point is that we do not know those things exactly!
-
Turkish fail! You clearly didn't follow your own advice! Try typing this into Chat GPT... "Does every CEO have the same duties at football clubs?"
-
Here is an eye opener for you. CEOs of football clubs do not have the exact same duties as each other, it can vary considerably. There are some core things most do, but in other other areas their job role can look very different with delegations to others particularly the bigger the club is.
-
Ruling Lampard out for a Pompey "connection" is bizarre. He is not a blood relative of Harry Redknapp, and even if he was... so what? Lampard has never played for or managed Pompey. Ruling out candidates due to association to rival clubs by their uncles makes little sense.
-
The article is not behind a paywall in the UK.
-
Well... it is key to the discussion. Calling for someone to be sacked, when he might not be responsible for the things he is being accused of is irrational.
-
I do know our income will be significantly higher than theirs. I do know that our wage budget will be significantly higher. Their transfer spending won't be able to be close to ours (takeover or not) due to how the financial rules work.