Jump to content

Matthew Le God

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    31,138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matthew Le God

  1. It won't because we are talking about the squad as it is on 5th July, a long time before the window has closed.
  2. The current squad is packed full of proven top Championship-level players. Beyond Ipswich, Leicester and Sheff Utd, the other clubs in the league are a long way below our current squad quality. Let alone thinking we'd come 10th with the current players!
  3. Not sure how you've worked that out. More like a top 3 squad as things are currently.
  4. What is dodgy about the Wrexham sponsor deals?
  5. The online store shows red numbers when you use the 'add personalisation' option for names and numbers. https://share.google/5dYHkCBMLK8F5MqWT
  6. In terms of goal output, only 4 goals in 47 games in Saudi Arabia suggests otherwise
  7. I didn't say the goals were not his fault, I said they were not "solely his fault". Key difference!
  8. I'd prefer if we had better. Ideally we'd keep Ramsdale, but I doubt that will happen.
  9. Not solely a keepers fault, the team as a whole defends against the ball. Plus the style of play played a big part in the number we conceded.
  10. They were our keepers when we were promoted.
  11. Can you provide a link to the source?
  12. One of those four... doesn't have a manager even with pre season starting, has an owner with financial issues in their companies, has PSR issues and has a possible big points deduction heading its way
  13. The Eastleigh game might be too soon. Most players after summer international tournaments or friendlies have a holiday break afterwards as they missed the one non international players have just had. Very occasionally some don't or keep it short, particularly those that have joined a new club.
  14. No where in that text does it say that non white males will have an advantage in the selection process. It is merely encouraging those from other groups to apply. It is still selecting on merit, so it is not discrimination.
  15. What exactly are you saying in that post is discrimination and why?
  16. The only bit of info of note from it really is the potential addition of Clement Lemaitre to the backroom staff. Which shouldn't really be top secret news that the club will be desperate to prevent becoming public knowledge.
  17. Which line of the text he posted do you think is discrimination and why?
  18. He ran the holding company into administration and close to financial ruin! Not sure he should be giving them advice!
  19. The post I linked to from an Echo journalist stating what he was told by the club. A journalist that regularly gets info from the club. That is a big difference from many other journalists who do not get updates direct from the club and significantly more substantial than some of the random sources in the transfer thread. A rumour has an element of doubt to it, this is far more than that for the reasons I outlined. So warrants its own thread.
  20. It is more than just a rumour. The club has confirmed their interest to the Echo.
  21. It wouldn't impact Charles financially. His wages are paid by his employer (Saints) not the loan club. The loan club pays the parent club a % of the value of the wages, they don't pay the player himself.
×
×
  • Create New...