Matthew Le God

You have misread it, makes sense how it is. "With a victory", Saints go within two points of 2nd.

As a player... Why would Saints really need a 42 year old who hasn't played for 3 years? As a manager... Why would Cortese offer he job to someone with no real managerial experience? As a person... Di Canio is a self confessed fascist. Not the type of person we want at Saints.

Grant Holt is the Championship's 3rd top scorer this season with 19 Championship goals. To think Lambert doesn't have the pace for the Championship is a nonsense.

Listen to Nigel Adkins comments about Puncheon and it is quite clear he will never play for Saints again.

No it doesn't. Huddersfield can can 91 points. Saints have 68 points. 68 points plus 21 points = 89 points That would mean Huddersfield getting

Plymouth will be relegated before we play them on 2nd May. They are already 8 points adrift from safety, with an inferior goal difference and only 8 games left.

Norwich's Grant Holt isn't exactly quick and he is doing fine as the Championship's 3rd top scorer this season. The Championship isn't much off a step up for good League One sides as Norwich, Leeds and Millwall have shown. Joseph Mills and Simon Gillett both play regularly in the CHampionship and struggled to get in the Saints team. Jason Puncheon is 3rd choice wide player for Saints and is starting games in the Premier League.

Isn't that taken as a given on this forum?

Why would one of Barnard/Lambert have to be sold if Craig Mackail-Smith signed for Saints (and didn't go to Norwich)? David Connolly probably won't get another contract, so that opens up a striker spot in the squad.

But if he was(and you agree he was), then it was a diamond and not 4132.

As Peterborough are behind Saints and Huddersfield are in front, I think a Peterborough win against Huddersfield next weekend would be better for Saints than a draw between them.

It was a diamond. Hammond was sitting just in front of Jaidi and Fonte from kick off in the first half.

Along with the fullbacks attacking, the width is also meant to come from the two strikers pulling out wide and the player in the hole staying central.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IquAh2Tgi10

Why should they? Plymouth shouldn't do things like buy a new pitch for £500k in the summer of 2010 when they knew they couldn't afford to pay for it.

They do already. Solidarity payments given to all 72 Football League clubs each year... http://www.premierleague.com/staticFiles/4a/65/0,,12306~91466,00.pdf

Argyle are going to offer creditors 1p in the pound in the CVA. 20x worse than Pompey!

I agree ^

I'm hurt by that comment.

No longer a rumour. Nigel Adkins confirmed today that Jack Stephens has been to the club to have a look round.

How do you know?

It is not that the Football League would throw them out. It is that the club might be liquidated on business grounds - nothing the Football League would/could do about that.

Lee Barnard is 5 foot 10" or 178cm, which is hardly a midget! Certainly not short enough for a chant about being small. I should be asking you - Are we talking about the same Lee Barnard here? I get to plenty of games as a season ticket holder. Do you?

I was just asking as I genuinely thought it was something else. That line doesn't come across very clear from the Northam when they sing it, to my seat in the Kingsland. Just seemed odd to me they would chant about him being short, when he isn't.