Give it to Ron
Subscribed Users-
Posts
9,608 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Give it to Ron
-
Agreed our demise began with shocking recruitment and failure to address shortage on positions. Whoever decided to gamble on Stewart’s fitness and a 6m German 2 player needs sacking!! Plus Norwich 3rd keeper leaving us with 2 average keepers.
-
I have seen reels from Bertrand and Austin saying as much.
-
He wouldn’t even be considered so no point wetting about it - the point is he has achieved more than Stilll
-
Not achieved anything except at Rangers stopping Celtic winning 10 in a row. O’Neil keeping a terrible Wolves team up. Carrick getting Boro in play offs …..let’s stick with Still who got a team in French league 8th some achievement that coupled with great job he is doing. I’m with you!
-
Why would he leave Stoke for us?
-
Southampton 0-2 Preston - Match Thread
Give it to Ron replied to Convict Colony's topic in The Saints
To replace who? -
Blackburn 2-1 Saints - Match Threads
Give it to Ron replied to Willo of Whiteley's topic in The Saints
This is Blackburn not City, he looked decent v Norwich reserves in the cup earlier. If the plan is to take off Scienza do t you bring on like for like not a defender shoe horned into midfield like it seems Still did with Stephens. i wanted Still to succeed we were sold his tactical nous and flexibility….have not seen it all is he scared , out of his depth or just incompetent at this level. -
Ings free kick lol landed in row ZZ. Tangana had a mare, Preston just physically strong with a game plan battle for everything.
-
So I sort of accepted some of it because Christ Janders miss was astonishing but why keep 3 centre halves all game? Where is the tactical manager that switches 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 or 4-4 fcking2 yet all I have seen is a rigid 5 with 3 defenders and just a Martin type shuffle of players in same places.
-
All this XG bollox ….is it XG that plays 5 at back v Swansea at 0-0 when they take off their best player on 65 mins? Is it XG that when 3-1 down takes off a forward and midfielder plays Fellows wing back yet keeps a back 5 again? We were sold Still as a flexible tactical manager….im yet to see it!
-
He should be ordered to stay as long as the captains new contract or pay it up if he wants out 🙂
-
Problem is who will identify and sign them ? Spors?who is responsible for Downs!! Only by stopping this ridiculous must have a sell on for all purchases just buy a proven striker not one from German 2 for £6m hoping to make it £20m
-
We had 75% possession early and 1 scuffed shot to show for it.
-
Your last sentence says it all and why he lost me tonight. He does nothing to affect a game - no shape change - 60m sat on bench. How does he manage to make players worse? My mate Brentford ST holder rated Mads solid 7/10 every game he played - looked ok first 2 games then shocking why when he performs well in Prem at Brentford? Azaz looks lost, Fellowes scapegoat hoiked off then just impact sub in same shape not working next game! I don’t want him to fail, I want a manager not scared to alter tactics- he got away with it against Pompey when was his first sub 80+? Still needs to win me back -not sure he can tbh
-
Our tempo is soooo slow I switched over and watched a bit of Millwall v Stoke who played light years ahead of our plodding system. Is this Still’s French standard? Is he used to being the underdog in France and can’t up his ability to be a team playing to win? He seems afraid to change which we were sold was his strength -flexible and changes yet Saturday and tonight abysmal tactics- like for like subs no change of formation. can’t all be bad luck Scienza scores and their lucky second again goes against us but what did he do to win game? I wasn’t against him and was all for giving him time but Christ he isn’t showing anything like we thought he would be from all that club PR gumph. I wanted Cooper and haven’t changed from that but how will club sack Still proving again got it wrong!!!😑
-
Armstrong and Archer are not focal point strikers are they ? Target men is what was required to compliment them and BBD was played wide and clearly Onauchu was off all summer we all knew that. Why buy wingers if you don’t have a target man? SR gambled and got it wrong again
-
So why is he playing like his feet are tied together? We didn’t need to spend big there were players out there but they didn’t have sell on value and that doesn’t meet the business model SR have - just sometimes you have to deviate from that. Gambling on Stewart’s fitness and Downs to come good in a position we couldn’t take a chance on is on SR don’t agree with you here.
-
Exactly we bought the others but needed someone to get on the end of Fellows, Wee man and Scienza crosses. We put so many crosses deep yesterday but no one was there ever!!
-
Because his play and teams need an outlet hold up player to bring the others in to play. The first ten minutes yesterday I saw some great play haven’t seen from us in ages. Once Stewart went that’s it gone. I saw in that ten what we could be but can’t without a striker we didn’t buy - he now has to adapt with what we have if that’s an u21 or Aribo I don’t know .
-
I said type….not specifically them
-
Do you think our forward recruitment was acceptable? The one position we couldn’t gamble with?
-
Not really if you include Hull as well - Woods , Quarshie were fine today . Our issue is as we all knew at start of season we shouldn’t gamble on Stewart and a 6m German 2 player. We needed a Bishop, McBurnie, Keiffer Moore, type and now paying the price not signing one. Stephens wouldn’t control midfield or The lack of outlet to get us up the Pitch
-
I said that to my son at the game today we needed a leader to take control and run the game - we don’t have one so let them come at us. we started well but as soon as Stewart went you could see it just sank. Stills game needs an outlet focal point as soon as Ross went we didn’t have one. Aribo can play centre half can he play up front? Can’t be any worse.
-
Anyone know best pub for this?
