Crouchie's Lawyer

Known as the perfect keyboard for use while surfing for porn

:smt041

Does Crouchie even have a new persona then? From what I read, he did make a bit of an e-d!ck out of himself. Surely here or b-anter would be the last place he would wanna go?

Now, now, my jon-j little friend

Rushden & Diamonds

Funnily enough, forums start with one creator and grow. This one was only set up the other day

Deal with it Crouchie

Nope that is a whole new revolutionary idea :smt015

You love it :smt064

Although my name is Ben and I am indeed a Legend , Im afraid I am not him:(. No where near enough Smilies to be him:D:D:D. Although I have seen some of his posts about who we should sign in the past, and he seemed a little, erm, shall we say 'unrealistic'

yup

I certainly blame you

My name is Ben, I live in Fareham, I wear 36" trousers and My Mrs has a pussy not a rat. Well she did have a rat, but her pussy ate it

They got you staplers on your birthday fred. Gimpoid

I was having an arguement with BO and Robsk the other day which rules those two out as alternative usernames! Although, I think they would feel very proud to have been linked with being me!

I will add that to the list of people I dont know! Infact, isnt there a Nexus or something that posts on the main bored with a red killer avatar? The story behind me, is that I was posting on the Main board (And I was a member, long before the whole re-registering thingy, but I never knew about TL and TMS) and used to frequent the main board to check up on *cough* takeover's and signings. I was changing my avatar or loading a picture up or something, and was unsure how to link pictures to the post. MB PM'd me details and asked if I wanted to be part of the bewbs PM. At the time I didnt even know what 'bewbs' were (obviously I knew what t!ts were but didnt know bewbs = boobs) He pointed me in the direction of TMS and I thought there were some funny characters here so stayed here posting. It coincides with when I switched jobs to one where I am not working 24/7 so have a lot more time to look on tinterweb, however there is only so much looking at ebay and facebook which you can do in one day before it gets boring, so I post on here. Thats it really. Sorry to disappoint those who think I am someone else!

Im afraid there is no 'apparently' about it, I do live just down the road from you. And you know who I am you daft bint, your my friend on f::ckbuck! And you loved each and every second of that minute!

I dont even know half the usernames/people your accusing me of being!

People can suggest what they wish to suggest, and providing there are genuine reasons behind it, then fair enough. We dont know the in's and out's behind it all, you are right, however, it seems someone has suggested banning christmas trees as the christmas tree is traditionally linked with Christianity and as such, would offend non Christians. Regardless of what 'fuel' the Daily Mail may or may not have added to the fire, you cannot honestly say this is a sensible suggestion? For example, the FA would never say 'lets trial a square lead filled ball' would they? Its just a stupid f*cking thing to say. Its common sense. My 'beef' is with the people/person who suggested this as a serious thing to consider.

You can shut it too, you know I am none of these people! The law suit is getting bigger as these threads continue to grow! I have read that 'golden' thread on b-anter after a few references to it and it did make me laugh.

Who is Keef?

Bates, set this c*nt straight.

Isnt plastic saint Wiltshire? Again, this is not me either

Although it seems I have a similar posting style to him (I dont know him, only know of him from what I have seen on b-anter) I am not Crouchie. A few people can confirm this. Although if it makes you, Tiggs, Wiltshire etc sleep better at night, then you can think of me as Crouchie

You know what, f*ck off you muggy little c*nt. I made a relevant point and your hatred for all things Daily Mail and the like means you can't let someone get their view point across without you twisting it to see what you want to see which you then jump on with a completely pointless arguement. All I was saying is that whoever has these genius thoughts of 'lets ban or outlaw x, y or z for the benefit of 1, 2 or 3' is insane, however you jumping to the defence of these people is making me think it may have been your decision to suggest banning xmas trees! You certainly are digging in your heels sticking up for them!