Crouchie's Lawyer

So you call me a mongtard for suggesting it, then suggest it yourself? In my initial quote I said 'fish4 and the like' meaning websites where you could search online and/or upload your CV. I think he understood what I was meaning.

The press may fan the flames yes, but it was said by someone in the first place for them to get hold of it. Albeit shot down or refused striaght away, my point is, what the hell was going through the minds of the person/persons who said it initially? Did they not engage their brains before speaking?

I think the issue is that they want to live their lives normally and (and I would be hazarding a guess here) white 'know it all's' in the local government or business are obviously trying to score points on the ethical front by suggesting these absurd rules. This brings it to the attention of the Daily Mail and like and consequently fuels a lot of hate mongering towards the ethnic minorities. I think given the choice, they would say it actually offends them more when it is suggested than when it isnt! But yes, saying it 'may' offend someone else or a certain 'group' of people does offend me. How about the person/people it is allegedly going to offend give their view? If the majority of them (or even a significant minority) are offended, then by all means bring in a law which will not offend them.

Twaddle on ducky, you post your fair share of it too! xxx

This is what I wish to know

Bates, how many times do I need to tell you, making your cups of tea and wiping your bum when you go to the loo is not labouring! On a serious note though Rich, have you tried fish4 and the like?

Ahhh, did you lose your job because S.C.C didnt want to offend Muslims?

Toilet paper Propping up a wonky chair Fire paper (Stuff you light and put under the logs in a real fire) When rolled up, can be used as a fly squatter / weapon

Regardless of if they get passed or not, the pure suggestion of these 'laws' or rules should never happen. So, there are still xmas tree's in west quay, right, but which c*nt came up with the suggestion (implemented or not) to remove them as to not offend? The Daily Mail may blow things out of proportion with their reporting and exagerate things a lot, but there is an initial plonker who says/does something which merits a story being wrote about it!

Thats very lolable. Very funny how he dragged it out with the 7 legs! :smt042

Hmmm, Nottingham Forest are no Manchester United. Traditionally, the week before xmas has not been a 'bumper' week for Home attendances either and with the credit crunch still very much in place, I would be surprised if we made 20k for this fixture. Very surprised. Fair play to the club for doing this though, but I think its come a little too late.

He should be blamed IMO aswell, failing to notice a kid has a broken back! Understandably a bit cranky, and IMO all the more reason he should have looked at the kid.

I have the best clunge FACT

They do have some crazily cheap offers on at the moment TBF

:smt042 You messed up admit it! Anyway, on a slightly different note, I think I must be built upside down. My Feet smell and my nose runs! (For the record ladies - I wouldnt want to spoil your prefect visions of me, my feet do not smell!)

Anyway, before reading the thread, I thought Hatch was on a 'Infraction' mission :shock:

passed or past? (That was either a strategically placed error, or an ironically funny mistake!)

I saw that too. You have to have safe search turned off though!

I have not edited anything you have said corp, mearly added a date to your post. Feel free to check those dates if you do not believe them. I do not even believe an announcement will be made in your timescales. From your initial claim, you seemed to imply that a deal had been done and that it would be announced within two weeks that (and reading between the lines) a chinese consortium would take over. Now you are saying there are loads of other parties interested and talks are on going. So the Chinese thing died then? Or (and more than likely) you don't actually know whats going on, yet come on here claiming you are ITK to grab your little bit of attention? Because the papers are always the people to trust when it comes to news regarding takeovers which (if exist) seem at a very early stage. Are these the same papers which jumped on the South African funded takeover which turned out to just be a meeting about buying players? :roll: Nice to see you're still clinging onto hope though. Well we have hundreds, if not thousands of people interested in buying us. I for one, would love to buy Saints. Problem is, a) I dont have enough money and b) even if I did, one look at the balance sheet would see that it is a major money losing entity. I think your problem Corp, is that you are wishful thinking. Like we were with Paul Allen. We have been linked with as many, if not more potential sugar daddy buyers or consortiums, and this has got us nowhere. I wouldnt be too quick to shoot my mouth off with all your claimed ITK comments. Afterall, if the super rich dont mind losing money, then why, after looking at our finances, have potential suitors been put off? I mean come on, our debt is less than yours, our infrastructure is a hell of a lot better. Only difference I can see is us being in the CCC. However, about £10-£15m invested into the playing side should see us become a Premiership team and then Saints are on an even keel with Pompey, yet with a superior ground, training facilities, youth set up and arguably a bigger fan base. 5 days remaining for this 'announcement'. Hmmm

I maybe quite spiritual Robsky my old friend, however, I wouldnt go as far as calling me Christ. That would just be silly. :smt102

Carly Zucker Nicola McLean - Hewwo!

What is it you do?

I can see your house. I expect it crashed after being intoxicated flying through a cloud of 'smoke' over your house! :smt045

Its a plane. Doesnt everyone have one in their back garden?

Yes, you should be the TMS elect for Jungle fun next year. Can you eat donkey boll*cks?