Whitey Grandad

The sad thing about it all is that I think he really believes in his philosophy. I don't know of any commentator or pundit who thinks that it will ever work with the tools that we have available to us.

Just because it worked out OK doesn't mean that it was the right way to do it. Basically, he got lucky in more ways than one.

We are committed to that spend whether he's here or not.

But what if they've got a season ticket?

It's a definite red card. No choice.

The keeper is never going to score from there. He is as afar from the opponent's goal as you could get.

It's there to be pulled.

Her lips don't lie.

We can only hope that he mouthed off at the officials as he left the pitch.

It was some time ago but who was it who got sent off for us at West Ham for getting his fingers caught in that ladyboy's hair? I don't think VAR was around then

It wasn't broke but we're well on the way to breaking it.

But then how could I scribble little possible numbers all over the screen?

Fruit

My wife liked the crosswords but it’s the Sudokus for me. Ever since Covid they have been printing extras. I don’t know if I would buy a hard copy if it weren’t for them.

I only by The Times for the puzzles.

I believe that a country cannot be considered for NATO if there is an unresolved conflict going on.

Yep. Draws in the tavckle then skips away from it. Exciting to watch.

I wish him all the best.

Some countries do that. At the Vancouver Whitecaps games that I went to there was a VAR incident where the referee went to the pitchside monitor and disallowed their goal for a foul somewhere. He announced his decision over the PA but I couldn’t understand a word of it. It was similar to what they do in American Football. As it happened I didn’t agree with the decision but as we were told, “the referee is not always right, but he’s never wrong”.

I’d like us to go through but I shall be away for this one anyway. I used to make sure that I was available for any Saints games but nowadays I have lost interest. I shall even be on holiday for the Chelsea and Tottenham games. Best of luck chaps 🫣

The officials are all miked up so there would have been a discussion.

Armstrong ran across the line of the cross and very nearly touched it. He clearly attempted to play the ball but how much that affected any opponent is a topic for endless discussion.

That’s understandable but couldn’t they have one official checking the Armstrong situation whilst the other is checking Archer. To take more than four minutes is a nonsense.

In offside only two possibles. The Arsenal one is a separate incident in a separate game with different officials. With something as subjective as interfering with play or an opponent then there will always be differences of opinion. That’s the way that it is.

It was a correct outcome. Or by ‘correct outcome’ do you mean a decision in favour of Saints? Please note that I said a correct outcome and not the