Whitey Grandad

I think that's fair. He's certainly no good as a classic left back.

Why do you feel the need to swear? Is your case that weak? What I'm saying is that no matter how much extra tax you or I pay it wouldn't be spent on potholes, it would go to some local authority chief executive or some other 'more urgent' cause.

If you've ever been subject to a tax investigation then you'd know that HMRC will screw you for every penny that they can squeeze out of you and will bend the tax laws to suit themselves and there's nothing that you can do about it. They are not interested in you paying what you should, they interpret the laws to suit themselves.

That also means some people paying less.

All very noble but I don't think that paying more taxes will get rid of the potholes and the litter.

All good points.

I don't think we need it and I don't think it's 100% accurate. I refer back to that early game in the World Cup. The photos of the ball taken from looking along the line disappeared very quickly, so quickly that I never got to see them. Anyway, ball in or out of play is a matter of fact, not opinion.

It cannot have been a wrong decision. If it was a matter of opinion. An opinion can never be wrong.

Did you miss the two words and question mark at the end of the sentence?

The amount at stake is totally irrelevant to the sport. Cricket has been distorted by referrals and rugby has been totally ruined and turned into stop-go American Football.

Exactly.

Unfortunately they are the ones ahead of you in the queue. And there's only a queue because they are in front of you.

There would be different queues for EU and non-EU.

I very clearly asked if they were. My last words were 'weren't they?' So were they not?

Well I'm not any clearer. All I was saying that we neither want nor need the American system here. That is far more rigorous than ours As I said previously I can't see any serious problems with travel either in or out of the EU but I would expect it to take a little longer if we did not hold an EU passport. We stopped actually keeping records of who came and left the country in the 1960s which is a shame. Nowadays over 250m international passengers use our airports each year and once they are in the UK, even on a limited-time visa there is no mechanism for tracing and ejecting those who overstay their allowed time.

The US requires fingerprints. Even with a modern passport you still have to check that the person matches the document. Have you tried the automatic system for machine readable passports at Gatwick? It uses facial recognition, takes forever and needs a supervisor to show how to use it. It's much quicker to go through the manned channels.

Yes I agree, there does at face value appear to see some variation in interpretations but almost every incident is different. The FA (and FIFA) do go to great lengths to try to get some consistency through regular seminars and training sessions but at the end of the day it's going to come down to one person's decision and cannot be decided by a majority vote of a committee. There are some situations where if you had 100 referees 50 would decide one way and the rest the other.

But these weren't mistakes by any stretch, were they?

Always sad to lose a member. You are all friends in one way or another. My condolences to her family.

It's very difficult to stop these large multinationals from doing it through transfer pricing or a number of other measures and it needs international cooperation which the EU has been working on for some time. We're all still waiting for the budget details but I believe there was something in there about restricting allowances against debt interest payments.

Well, yes they can. A cruise ship arriving is hardly a surprise. To be fair, I have always found them friendly and welcoming but my experiences have varied on breezing through to waiting in line for a couple of hours and this goes back several decades over entries direct by aircraft from the UK and from Canada and New Zealand. All I am saying is that I don't believe the US system would work for us and neither do I believe it necessary. I wouldn't foresee any problems in any future arrangements.

No, no and thrice no. An official makes a decision that you don't like. That doesn't mean that he is wrong, it's his opinion. There is no right of appeal in football (during the game). If you don't like it then play some other game. I'll be honest and say that I've only seen the Huth incident so far but from what I've read none of these decisions would ever be overturned by video referral. Video referrals have ruined cricket and rugby. Basically, all you are says no is that you didn't like a decision and you would prefer a different one.

I'm not talking about working there, just going as a tourist. You need to apply for an ESTA first which is valid for two years but you still need to join the queues. Maybe if you arrive by plane and there aren't too many of you its not so much of a problem but when a cruise ship turns up with a few thousand passengers and crew it's a different story. Yes, 'dabs' are fingerprints. Must be my London background showing through.

I sincerely hope not. If you've ever queued for two hours at US Customs and Border Protection to get your dabs taken you'll understand why we don't want that.

He's a professional footballer who's paid a lot of money. If that means that he spends a season on the bench he should be grateful.