SaintBobby

Agree on some of the OTT stuff. But if Pinnacle have rolled out Fialka to enhance their credibility, then God help us. If TL believes Fialka adds "weight" and "substance" to the deal, I'm deeply concerned about how he got a visa to visit planet Earth in the first place.

Can you sack him, then? If so, please do...what a tw*t....

I might be persuaded to complain IF ever deal goes t*ts up. So far, I think Fry has been pretty excellent. I'm also not going to make a di*k of myself by firing off letters of complaint (a)before I know the full details and (b) possibly a few hours before a deal is completed.

And other interested parties could apply for exclusivity immediately.

Can this be blocked, removed or down-graded please. Not appropriate and not even remotely funny.

If the Swiss consortium is serious, and really want to buy the club quickly, why not pay say £50K for a 96 hour exclusivity period? They could knock Pinnacle out of the ball park...

Impeccably bad (good?) timing - see update on anotehr thread.

I'll gladly accept this from TL. But it does mean today is the day. If this drags on over another weekend, that stretches credulity. So, here's hoping. Plus it will also be a delicious fringe benefit for the morons like GM to be proven wrong.

League 2 or Blue Square rather than -25 in League One.

The Football League can't run its members' club in breach of the law. It may be doing just that.

August 8th. We have time to accommodate four weeks, if we survive that long.

Jackson's a fantasist. Don't believe a word he says. In fact, if he does say something it actually makes it less rather than more likely that its true. The chances of Peter Reid being the next manager are falling merely in virtue of Jackson suggesting it.

I'm just beginning to lose fiath in Pinnacle. Given a straight chocie between Pinnacle and the (unknown) Swiss, I might now prefer to take a punt on the latter.

I get the sinking feeling that today really is the last chance saloon.

Is this actually true? Are there no legal limits on their discretion?

It's enfuriating. I probably concede we deserve the ten point penalty - but refusing to allow Saints to play in League One unless Pinnacle surrender all rights of apeal is, as others have said, disgraceful. I don't even see why the appeal needs to be dealt with before the kick off at the first game. Points deductions have been made in the course of a season before - including a coupel of occassions last season. Okay, it migth be bad news to see Saints win an appeal after 42 or 43 games, but I don't see why it would be a problem in, say, September or October. What I don't know - and I doubt many posters do - is whether the League's behaviour is illegal in some way. One school of thought seems to be that it's the FL's league, so they can impose whatever rules they want. But there are obviously legal limits to this. I'd doubt that they could apply conditions such as (a) you must write a personal cheque of £10,000to Lord Mawhinney or (b) you must sack all your black players etc. So, the real question is whether rescinding the right to appeal is on the legal or illegal side of the line. I suspect it is illegal and subject to judicial review, but I'm not a lawyer.

Am not confident that the takeover will happen today, but I do hope to hear something from the FL. Even if they are a bunch of old crusties...

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/4451026.Pinnacle_fighting_for_right_of_appeal_against_points_deduction_in_Saints__takeover/ Where's it say that the FL meeting has finished?

Good news and thanks for the update.

The bloke is so completely nuts that I genuinely feel he could unite the fanbase into a "Bring Back Lowe" campaign. For that even to be contemplatable shows just how bad he is.

The evidence seems to point to the view that the legal advice received by Pinnacle, MLT, Fry et al, points to us having a very strong - possibly watertight - case against the ten point penalty. If this is so, then I'd be loathe to see us surrender on the -10 points too easily. I really think it could well end up being the difference between promotion and non-promotion, so a good few million quid ride on it.

Good to see the press as confused and divided as posters on here!

About 80%, but if deal not concluded in next 36 hours, this % starts to tumble fast.

I know most Saints fans are agonising about whether they'd like Matt Le Tissier or Marc Jackson to become the next Chairman of Southampton Football Club. It's one of those evenly balanced, very hard to call, knife edge judgements. Here's some footage to try and help you make your mind up: Le Tissier http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUt5CQPyWzs Jackson http://asf.narrowstep.tv/mcp?psid=86...d=175029&fab=0 I still can't decide between the two of them....:-)

Cos Mark Fry can't prove it either. He can't just turn Jackson away because he reckons he's a bit of a loony. It's not as if the world's billionaires are queueing up to buy the club. A delusional Walter Mitty photocopier salesman - who's willing to bluff - gets a hearing, I'm afraid. I honestly believe that I could have put together a bid with my missus that would have had to have Fry's serious attention. I'd probably only be found out when I had to write a big cheque, but I could quite easily indulge my own insane fantasies (and get some coverage in the Daily Echo) until that time. See the whole AFC Bournemouth embarrassment if you're in any doubt on this. Especially the regional TV interview with Jackson. If you can watch that interview without p*ssing your pants laughing several times, you have an abnormally strong bladder.