Turkish

Quite, a lot of linesman would have given it and given him the benefit, but rules are rules and it was the right call. I'm sure we'll get one go our way soon. Rodriguez is definitely a confidence player and lacks that swagger a top striker needs, he has all the attributes, just lacks that arrogance that makes a decent player a good one.

Whatever you might think about the rules or the linesman it was the correct decision. I don't like it either but that doesn't mean it was the wrong call.

To be fair you are talking about milliseconds, he was just unlucky with that, it was the right decision but another linesman would have given it and given him the doubt. It was the right decision but You're literally talking about fractions in that case, He moves Towards the ball half a second later hes on and its a goal. His header from osvaldos cross which went straight at the keeper was poor though.

And to cap it all you had a dodgy pasty. Wasn't your day was it.

Well you're wrong. The rule is that any part of the body is nearer to the goal than the defender that is offside. It was very tight and maybe the benefit should have gone to the attacker but going by the rules he was marginally offside.

I want Rodriguez to do well, he's young, English and seems like a good guy. But the reality is he had a spell of about 5 games around March time last year where he was excellent and that really has been about it, there is a good player in there somewhere but at the moment he wouldn't be in my first XI once Ramirez and Osvaldo are up to speed.

Wow, you seem very upset, that pie must have been awful

It was offside, it was one of those where it was so tight maybe the benefit should go with the attacker, but he was just ahead of play when the ball was played, it was very, very tight but he was just off.

He ran out of time as he has to think about Watfords match these weekend,

Not sure why he's taking responsibility for a defender falling Asleep 3 minutes into a game at a dead ball. Maybe it was a tactical decison he made.

That's one of the reasons why yanks and canadians are so fat.

I agree, thought we looked a bit light weight down the right, he was excellent in the middle though.

Seriously. Were you there for the football or to stuff your fat faces?

well that was frustrating. There are goals here for us but we need to move the ball quicker. Some lovely deliveries from Ward Prowse but not really being attacked properly. So slow getting it forward.

Also Wanyama looked awesome, Lovern didn't give Anelka and Long a kick last week and doubted Bale was as good as Shaw at the same age.

Gushing praise on soccer Saturday and well deserved too, spot on what they are saying.

Good depth in the squad now, 7 decent subs too.

You have to say rather than spending 10s of millions and reducing prices to fill it Cortese will be congratulating himself on a spot on ticketing price policy. Keep the price high and sell out or just about. As some of the more sensible poster suggested that this would happen rather than the ridiculous easy jet, dynamic pricing and German models that banded about on here to justify stadium expansion. It means some people will have to pick and chose games but for the clubs perspective as long as there are near enough a full stadium paying as high a price as can be charges then they've got spot on.

I find it incredible that there isn't more interest. We've spent £70m in the last year, have a team packed full of internationals and exciting young talent and have made a good start to the season, yet still people can't get off their arse and attend.

What an intelligent and grounded individual. Not getting ahead of himself and making brash claims about what the club is going to do. Instead looking for gradual progress and letting the talking be done on pitch.

Yep, three minutes from the end of extra time.

Lying, lazy scumbag journos! The daily mail is a vile paper. They are only printing this to emphasise the fact that this black African has taken the job of a good English pro like dean Hammond, disgusting paper full of hate.

Apart from it not being a near miss you're right the city was buzzing, a lot of history has been rewritten about that season. , we should have won the FA Cup that season, that was the one that got away, not the title.

It also doesn't include lesbians who might feel alienated by this chant that implies that homosexuality is a solely male dominated activity. I mean a lesbian wouldn't have a boyfriend would they, so not only is the chant homophobic its also sexiest. 'Does your partner know you're here?' Is much more all encompassing it applies to gay men and women as well as straight people, although perhaps single people might be offended by this chant, so we need to come up with something that includes them as well.

Indeed he was sir. And he one and only goal and appearance came against?????