Turkish

You are funny Les. Got me on ignore but can't help but post about me all the time. Even telling others what they should do. Personally I'm looking forward to Pardews post match interview more than the game after youd told us this morning the sole purpose of his interview today was to set up his one tomorow praising himself for getting is where we are!!

Its not a question of what id do differently, its what we can gather from this is that those comment makers that were described as Ill informed by our chairman, we're clearly anything but and its evident that this story wasnt media bullsh*t that was made up. They were in fact spot on and the chairman was lying. It may have been for a good reason, but he was lying. So using this example as 'evidence' and 'proof' then maybe people shouldn't be so quick to dismiss other articles and opinions as liars with agendas and every word our chairman says as great news and gospel, as he now has a bit of form for not telling the whole truth doesn't he.

We had a chat to a few of theirs outside the Northam, good lads. Dont mind Coventry, a lot of similarities between us and them. Also remember their cup final in 1987 was the first one I really remember clearly, hot may afternoon and a cracking header from Keith Hounchen For one of their goals.

I'm not aware of any. So that entirely proves my point about Adkins constant praise of the chairman and trying to convince anyone who would listen that they have a great relationship, he wouldn't say anything else. As you rightly say, if he did, it wouldnt end well, again I thank you for proving my point.

I made this very point About Adkins comments post West Ham about him having a great realtionship with the chairman contray to reports. I was told I was wrong and Adkins wouldn't lie. Thanks for proving my point.

That's what I thought, of we didn't know better you might think he'd been told to say it.

Yet when Akdins has said in the past he has a great relationship with the chairman this has been lauded as quashing all the rumours they don't get on, yet in this case above it was simply people showing a united front as saying anything else would send out the wrong signals. How odd.

Colin, you seem to be getting a little upset. I'm merely responding to those that demand both sides of the argument and I'm presenting both sides of the argument on this case and asked people to form an opinion based on this. I'm simply provoking discussion and debate on this subject, seeing as many said Pardew was fired for a number of reason, one of which was not buying into Cortese and Reeds plans, this clearly can't be true as Cortese in the BBC article said they had agreed a plan for the coming season. Clearly either Pardew, the media and the illinformed comment makers were lying, or the chairman is. No where Did i say it was defintiely Cortese. I'm simply asking people to decide for themselves who this is.

Don't they play Man U soon? Might have to go to that one. We beat them up there didnt we? Seems like we have an excellent crop of youngsters coming through.

Not really. Point out what bit of that article is untrue or protecting him,other than the slight error that he gave Lallana his chance.

They aren't though are they, just interviewing him on his previous job where he quite clearly says that he was glad to be sacked, didn't get on with the chairman and want wanted as manager, which in contrary to what your hero said. And he signed arguably our best player and worked with over half the team that will play tomorrow. How much of that article is lies or protecting him?

Of course their is. The Northern Echo would have everything to gain from making stuff up and having an anti Saints agenda,

Who knows? But Prehaps this is a sign that everything Cortese says shouldn't be lauded as amazing news and everything said against him shouldn't be dismissed as bullsh*t and lies from people and media with agendas. As clearly they were right about this.

So everyone that insists on hearing both sides of the story before making a judgement. We have Pardews side of the story that he couldn't get on with the chairman, that he was glad to be sacked and that the chairman didn't want him as manager. We have Corteses version of events In the BBC article that he and the manager have a good relationship, the press were lying that his position was under pressure, those commenting on it were ill informed, that they have plans in the place for the coming season after a full review and he was happy with the progress of the club. 3 games into the season Pardew was sacked. Who is/was lying? Pardew, the media and the ill informed outsiders or the chairman?

No No No! This isn't true. It's the Northern echos anti Saints agenda!

Such liars. Making up stories to unsettle us. Also interesting to see Corteses comments about people who used to be associated with the club Voicing their opinions, all of them were wrong as well, Apparantly.

Regardless of who the other one was, he did say in L1 Lambert could play in the premier league, So it's fair to say he did spot his talent as a premier league player and signed him when others wouldn't. Les is clearly trying to discredit him for this.

Spot on fella. This is exactly how it is. You have to laugh at Les Benders comments tht Pardew is only saying it now so he is setting himself up for his post match interview when we've beaten them where he can praise himself for signing Lambert and getting us where we are, utter mongboard genius!

Spot on Barry. Just a mong board tip for You, you can only mention the amount of money when it suits, like here, when you discredit someone not associated with SFC. For example you are quite right to mention that we spent a ridiculous amount to get out of legue one to belittle Pardews role here, but if this thread was a pro Cortese one this would be irrelevant and you have to remember Cortese appointed Adkins when we were near the bottom of the table and he turned a crap, under performing team around into a team that would have won the league if the season had been 5 games longer. Other than that you are showing a lot of potential as a top mongboard poster.

Of course he is Les. He did actually say when we he was manager Lambert will be able to play in the premier league, as would Fonte, the rest have to prove they can. So of course, that point is correct, well done for being right for once.

It is hilarious though smirkers. The amount of nonsense spouted, I can why village Saint left the 'idiot' part of his name out.

When does work start on the needed stadium expansion by the way?

Looks like he's got it http://www.skysports.com/

Do you go to Swindon away that first season? I honestly thought there we would struggle to stay up, we were dire. He had to build a team during the season and install confidence in the players that were good enough but had been used to getting a hiding every week. Should we have made the play offs? Possibly, but we didn't underachieve, most of the £4m wasn't spent until January anyway so only really that team for half a season during which we were always playing catch up.

Probably putting hot water bottles in his bed as we speak.