View From The Top

Last night I watched Henry IV Part I on BBC2HD & it was simply outstanding. Part II on next Saturday. The Beeb at its very, very best.

He's thick as fu.ck.

Strange how you don't hear a peep out of the gutless fu.ckers now isn't it?

If we are going for a young keeper I'd still prefer Steele or Fielding.

Their owners have "loaned" then millions to buy players, hence Beckford on the same money he was on at Everton. That said, Mills just went to Bolton & they won't be paying huge money.

Totally. His performance there was similar to Davis at Leeds.

Depends on what line you use I reckon. I've just booked my Arsenal & Everton tickets & they were cheap as chips with my Friends & Family railcard.

In your opinion, not in mine.

But not Premier League standard.

He's not good enough IMHO & he's wanted by Burnley.

Burnley want him.

Possibly. It would appear no reason for there to have been any fee??

I agree, it's not nice, especially as I've been to Ibrox on a number of occasions & had a great time.

That nipper, IIRC, hadn't turned down a Newco contract as this lad had so, & I'm most likely wrong, they are similar but not the same.

Nothing underhand. As per employment law when Rangers were liquidated he became a free agent.

Yeah, right, let's let them butt fu.ck us for another £1.5 trillion as they are so important and got us into this mess in the 1st place.

Labour needed New International & The City to become electable. You are disputing that? The City & the tories are and always have been connected in a major way? You're disputing that? You're denying that the majority of big tory sponsors are City based? I'm not a Labour voter but you are so blighted by bigotry that your often good points are lost in your rants.

I'm not saying anything about the last Labour government (whose myriad of faults we all know) nor what they want now, I'm simply stating a fact regarding the tories credibility gap regarding The City & my own personal desire to see a judicial enquiry. Perhaps you should take your anti-labour blinkers off, they ruin your posts.

No, he's mates with AL's family & he's a proven track record of being right. Along with VMAN he's the most reliable poster.

I agree but let's not pretend that Osborne didn't say that the regulations under the last administration were too restrictive on the City and that "the markets" were quite capable of policing themselves. I'm all for less but effective but there appears to the a cultural problem with in The City, in addition to far too many politicians being on the payroll and I'd like a full judicial review.

The Spurs game, as I pointed out 2 weeks ago, was always going to be moved with Spurs being in the group stage of the Europa League & the Thursday being a game day. The only question was whether it would be moved to Sunday or Monday. The home game against Newcastle will also be moved in they go into the group stage. If Liverpool & Toon get into the knockout stages then more games will be moved in the New Year.

The problem the tories have is that they berated Labour for not having LESS regulation. Let's not forget Osborne's demands for the "lightest of touches" to allow us to emulate the Celtic Tiger. Labour was scared of The City & the Tories were, and are, on their payroll. We have a genuine opportunity for a full judicial review but there are so many vested interests, on all sides, that it won't happen.

They are all as bad as each other. I'd prefer a judicial review as, to me, it strikes be as "old boys" looking into "old boys", or "vested interest" looking into "vested interest".

Not going to pay to go to City when it's on the box, especially as I'm not sure I'll be in the UK that weekend now it's confirmed as a TV game.

I would imagine that this will be the most in demand away game of the season so what sort of allocation can we expect? Already booked my train.