hypochondriac

I personally know two of the s club juniors fact. Does anyone have anything they wish to pass onto Aaron?

But how do you know that from the start of the investigation they took the abduction theory as read.

How do you know that they took the abduction theory as read.

Fact is Tim you shouldn't have to. The forum gives you the option of anonymity for a reason and the only possible reason for wanting to know someone else's identity on here is to either do something unpleasant to them in real life or because of some weird curiosity and need to know. It's a favourite topic of pap's just because he isn't bothered about it don't let him bully you into revealing something you don't want to. The pertinent question is to know why pap is so keen to know who you really are.

Nah don't agree. One or two posters like alpine may delight in slagging off players but generally people call it how they see it. Gaston has been a major disappointment for many and osvaldo has had an underwhelming start. That's pretty much the truth of it and there is nothing wrong with saying that.

The only one I ever saw was some blood keep with overly long hair on Twitter. I wasn't particularly interested.

I'm just amazed he admitted Newcastle villa and Everton were bigger clubs than us.

Post your picture, name and personal details then according to pap you aren't a coward and you can say pretty much what you want.

OK so correct me if I'm wrong but you are saying you consider the Portugal investigation more credible and is the most likely explanation of what happened?

Apparently you aren't allowed to bring that up anymore because pap decided to leave it.

It's because you pipe up dismissing the police investigation and calling it too narrow and then when asked for proof or a more likely scenario you run away.

If you look at things from someone else's perspective surely you can see that that seems like a big cop out.

He won't. He has learnt from his past mistakes that people who asked that don't REALLY want to know they just want to dismiss it so he knows better now. He won't make the mistake of posting theories up any more.

Is everyone who doesn't what their name and personal details all over a public Internet forum a coward? And with regards to you getting along with enough people, who did you have in mind? Who is actually more inclined to believe the conspiracy theory of the Boston bomb or London attacks? The silent majority?

I guess it depends how long the plan has been in place. If it was right from the start then that is ridiculous. If it was a day or so before then that's slightly more believable.

I was talking about those who have written off osvaldo.

It's just that things get said like that and it becomes forum FACT

Really? We are the names of these posters?

Why is it stupid to report that juventus are looking at a loan bid. Especially if it's true!

Why is it stupid? It says juventus are trying to set up a loan deal which they may well be trying to do. If the player is serious about leaving and really doesn't feel he will settle to premiership life then maybe we will consider it if we can bring someone of comparable quality in and not lose out financially. Regardless, I fail to see how the article is stupid.

Tbh that is the main thing that is getting backs up at the moment. By suggesting that the widely accepted theory is wrong and that by extension the qualified policemen are talking cobblers and not doing their job properly yet not providing any details of an alternative scenario, it could be that pap's primary reason for posting is to get a reaction from others. I'm sure that isn't the case though and he is honestly trying to open the eyes of the sheep who will believe anything they are told by anyone in a position of power.

Care to respond to the points raised by myself and saintbletch?

I can only speak for myself here but I'm saying that I trust those vastly more qualified than myself (the police) to come up with the most likely explanation. At the moment this is seemingly the abduction theory. I think it would be interesting to continue the discussion if pap gave an alternative scenario that was more likely but he refuses to which to me suggests that he doesn't have one.

Where have you written your theory of events? All you have done is pick holes in what the current investigation thinks without suggesting a more credible scenario. It certainly appears that the reason you do not do this is because either you don't have a credible alternative theory or you know that any theory you come up with would have a number of holes and would be easy to dismiss.

I notice your quite adept at avoiding questions you don't like to answer.