hypochondriac

I turned it off a while ago but why does our manager never deviate from making changes at a predetermined time? We were crying out for a change after half an hour.

You questioned why it was pathetic and described it as "keeping hate out of Universities" which suggested a level of support for the idea that you should ban speakers from people you disagree with politically. In other words a child's idea of debating.

You accused others including me of being Tommy Robinson and Katie Hopkins supporters based on nothing.

You said it wasn't pathetic to ban speakers because you disagree with their opinions. It quite obviously is.

I'd say the nature of the problem isn't really understood by any of the main parties. I was surprised that David appears to have a better understanding than most politicians I have seen.

I was just posting shit and liked how it sounded.

Ironic that the blind bloke can see the situation better than anyone else in Labour l.

Fascination? It's about the club continuing to be financially viable.

That's true and I think making the playoffs is unlikely but Millwall or hull could start losing points too. 10 points is a lot but two wins and that becomes four if they lose both.

Also worth remembering that he hasn't really played in a hell of a long time.

Then you're blind quite frankly.

And the keeper.

A proper shit game but so often we lose those so in a way it's even more satisfying than an easy win.

Always said he was decent.

What a dull half.

Prague was excellent. Sat in a bar for about 6 hours and had about 12 beers each. Went to pay and it came to about £15 each. Ridiculous.

I just think some of the questions are things you really wouldn't answer strongly agree or disagree to unless you're a total twat.

I'm not sure it works. It seems thst every ends up not too far away despite clearly having wildly different views.

OK so the Times weren't suggesting that Boris was less corrupt than Starmer then were they. They were simply reporting on a poll that they commissioned.

So the yougov polling was biased?

They are reporting yougov polling not editorialising.

I'm not sure the Times made any comparison between Johnson and Starmer?

In fairness the Tories had a fair bit longer. Pretty impressive where Starmer has got to in just a year and a half.

Reporting in the Times and this stood out: "Meanwhile YouGov polling for The Times today shows that voters think that Labour under Starmer is more sleazy and disreputable than the last Conservative government" Regardless of those who think all these events are no big deal, ultimately that perception is what's going to do for Starmer.