hypochondriac

17th I would be very happy with. Anything more is a bonus for our first season back IMO.

I told you! Here is PompeyScot never going on here...

I strongly disagree with PompeyScot when he says that many pompey fans do not feel they are hard done by. Tons of them do, they say it all the time. You only have to hear the various MPs, people in authority and Neil Allen to see that. Most want the rules to be changed or compromises made to accommodate Pompey. The latest evidence for this is vilifying the players for wanting to keep their contracts. The likes of Kitson probably came to the club for one last pay day and to then see them lose the majority of what they were promised is unjust.

Which sadly most are unable to do because posters would get banned. I still don't see what is so bad about letting saints fans on there as long as they are respectful.

Nice to hear that PompeyScot believes they deserve everything they have been given as a club though. If only every skate was of that opinion.

Crab Lungs can you make the point that the alleged betting scam has been denied by everyone except Claus?

Oh yes he certainly seems fairer than a lot of them. I just find it amusing that he says he doesn't care and never looks on here when he has clearly had a look on numerous occasions.

Oh he has definitely been on here. I know because he took issue with some of the things I have said on here in the past. Normally he says things like "I never go onto their site but I just happened to this one time." It's amusing.

No idea. I have been banned three times. The first time I deserved it but the next two times I just tried to be civil and sensible. You made a very fair post there. I reckon even if I was a skate I would still feel the club deserved punishment because of how much they have completely taken the p*ss. In fairness, it seems like PompeyScot gets that, but many of them do not.

You will be banned almost straight away.

A post from corp ho on POL:

Most likely copies or off the back of a lorry too. At least if you buy in town you know they aren't nicked.

GFA! GFA! Ha. Good penalty.

Doesn't seem like a requirement we care about that much.

I'll never forget the time you beat my arcade score with the man and his little sword fighting green goo monsters. It's still upsetting.

Original Bournemouth saint is a spazzer.

Liar.

I'll buy it off you for 80 quid.

Good read about Gazza here when he was linked with Sunderland in January: http://www.not606.com/content.php/1779-Sunderland-and-Paulo-Gazzaniga

I didn't dismiss it outright. There was a big difference between the two statements, you were wrong and I'm glad you agree. Thanks for the apology.

So I didn't dismiss it outright then. Didn't think I did.

I get it perfectly. I just don't consider it likely. Unless you know something I don't?

Where? I said it was unlikely and I highly doubt it.

Not necessarily. It is possible that we decided that this messing around wasn't worth it and that we will see what happens with what we have. That decision isn't necessarily influenced by a two week period where Shaw has performed well.

I just don't believe we decided not to sign Buttner because of Shaw. It is obvious from the press and his comments that this messing around changed our minds.