-
Posts
43,354 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by hypochondriac
-
It works on mine. Weird.
-
The Gambia - Here to brighten up an already sunny day....
hypochondriac replied to St Louis's topic in The Saints
I would definitely donate. I reckon we should raise some funds to maybe bring him over. Not sure how that sort of thing is organised or I would set it up myself. If St Louis wants to sort something and he feels it is appropriate then that would be great! -
What is your take on it Steve? Surely it is a complete scandal? It means if Markus had not come along, we could have offered 90p in the pound and then gone into admin a year later offering miles less and scrapping the original cva with no penalty.
-
What??? That is disgusting. A real low point of the football league. A disgrace.
-
The fans profited from cheating and many showed no remorse and continue not to. Many actually feel they have been hard done by which is ridiculous.
-
Crap.
-
Works fine for me.
-
Lol sat on the board at a hospital. Priceless.
-
I don't think it was disappointing at all. It's entirely understandable that not a lot of people are interested in Orr season friendliest.
-
How would you like your Manager to be?
hypochondriac replied to Ivan Katalinic's 'tache's topic in The Saints
It's quite possible to love the bloke for what he has done on the pitch whilst at the same time be pretty nonplussed by his interviews. As I said, largely it doesn't matter but it would be nice to know what he really thinks and feels every once in a while. -
How would you like your Manager to be?
hypochondriac replied to Ivan Katalinic's 'tache's topic in The Saints
I like nigel's comments but it would be good if he made some more interesting comments after each game. As long as he keeps winning its just a very minor point though. -
What someone says and what transpires is not always the same thing. Circumstances change and this sort of thing is good evidence to suggest that any commitment is a long term one. It's pretty sad that you can't just accept good news like this in the spirit it was clearly intended.
-
I'll have it joe. In responsible for a French exchange student this weekend and thought I would take him to a game!
-
Yep. There is a shop on Shirley high street that does it for about 70 I think. Opposite to the old woolworths.
-
Now it is ridiculous. He has recovered and said he wants them to play.
-
Because I wasn't 'wrong'. I was disappointed with the signing based on the Celtic fans comments. I never wrote him off before seeing him play. What was I wrong about?
-
Of course. Brilliant that he turned out to be a gem. Nothing wrong with being disappointed by an arrival based on the available evidence. A few people (myself included) said they were disappointed based upon Celtic fans comments who had seen him play. Nothing wrong with making an initial comment about a player on a messageboard. It's not like people were booing him at the ground as soon as he arrived. It's exactly the same as being excited when we sign someone. I was pleased when we signed Lee but by your logic, I should not feel any emotion until I had seen him play. It's neither writing him off nor supporting him, it's making an initial comment about a player on a messageboard. I'm happy to say that the Celtic fans clearly did not know what they were talking about! (And arent we lucky.) Incorrect and misguided. You can't be wrong about an initial opinion.
-
Doing a Southampton: To occupy the automatic promotion places for the majority of the season before losing your last eight games and finishing third.
-
If we get promoted then we have done a Norwich because we were in league one and then got promoted twice in two seasons. To an outsider, that is the only comparison that is relevant.
-
It means that there weren't many posters on here who wrote him off before a ball was kicked. It's a popular myth started on here because people were initially unimpressed by his signing. Every time someone posts this mistruth I feel compelled to point out that it is a load of rubbish. Expressing disappointment or reservations about a signing on here whilst being fully prepared to change that opinion once you have actually seen him play for yourself is not 'writing him off'. I'm thinking about creating a stock response.
-
Just had a quick look at future plans and it looks interesting. I just hope they have less standing around talking and they develop some of the cast a bit more. Can't say I actually give a toss about Carol or T Dog so far who seem to be there just to make up the numbers. The same with some of the female survivors on the farm.
