hypochondriac

It's amusing how you three chums stick together and back each other up.

The webchat says they failed to sell their allocation! Appalling.

I think it is very dangerous and presumptive on your part to state that those who are critical of some players have very little knowledge of the game. I would imagine that is the case for certain fans in the ground (in fact I know it is because I hear them) but to generalise like that is very unfair.

I agree, criticising someone because it is cool is ridiculous. I don't agree with you that just because the coaching staff selects someone they are therefore beyond questioning. For a start, the coaching staff do not know for definite how a player is going to perform before a game.

From here:

Use the FC United song: We're having a party when Pompey dies Tail on the donkey when Pompey dies Jelly and icecream when pompey dies Pass the parcel when pompey dies

It is our responsibility to press the FL about this as well as contacting journalists to highlight the scandal.

According to the news chat, Chanrai and CVA could not afford the CVA so therefore they never had any intention of paying it in the first place. What a bunch of utter utter crooks. Unbelievable that they managed to con a judge in the first place.

It is two separate misdemeanors though, can you understand that?

I asked what was to stop another club from going into admin, agreeing a CVA and then going back in two years later and removing all the debts from the original as they have done if there is no deterrent. Surprisingly I got no reply!

Have you considered the possibility that there are valid criticisms for certain players? Certainly Guly has done a lot wrong this year in certain games and for me, Sharp has been pretty disappointing since he was signed. Barnard hasn't had much of a chance.

Because that has little relevance when discussing you inflammatory tone. Saying someone is dumber than you thought if they didn't understand what you meant is uncalled for and the general tone of your reply was patronising. I can say that I didn't know what you meant and perhaps being clearer on your part rather than dismissive would have been better and definitely more polite. Certainly LSC thought so which is why he thanked me for my reply which pointed it out. As always though, you are quick to point out the flaws in the posts of others whilst remaining blind to the failings in your own

People are discussing the possibility.

Calling someone dumb is pretty uncalled for tbh. The general tone of your post was very patronising With regards the rest of your post I'm not entering into your pettiness again. Why you feel the need to bring up things again says more about you than me.

If Lambert is not fit I would rather start him up front with Sharp than Guly.

Yes. Fox has done this when he has played badly and I really really hope he doesn't. Without Lee or Lambert I pray we just play it on the ground.

Equally some people have watched him for a long time and have seen a lot of performances that have frustrated them. Just because a select few are too critical does not make those who criticise him fairly any less valid with their criticism.

Hopefully at the end of the season!

Why are you so aggressive towards posters who hold an opinion that differs from your own? You ask for cogent arguments but then insult someone when they reply. No wonder posters take exception to your posting style.

Itchen north block 2 row p for me. Will look forward to giving abuse.

Lee has had an operation. My friend works with the club and has access to that information. I know it has already been posted but More reliable from more than one source.

I see canadasaint is at it again. How sad.

The more peaceful it is the less they will be able to justify their overtime.

I'm off to oz backpacking and working for 6 months in a months time. Would be good to meet up with some of you.

I think those are unrealistic totals TBH. West Ham won't get 87.