Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    41,907
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. Order another one through my referral link (and activate it ) and you get five pounds free credit: http://giffgaff.com/orders/affiliate/hypochondria Reception for me is perfectly fine. Never had any problems.
  2. Helps a lot though so he does have a bit of a point TBH.
  3. Possibly ML's dosh that enabled us to attract Adkin's interest and support him properly...
  4. Would be good to hear if the person who bought it was attracted to the sale because of the ebay ad. The way it was written certainly suggested that that was the case.
  5. He has a point in some ways. Of course our fanbase and management has had an effect on our position, but also none of this would have happened had we not had relegation and administration.
  6. Everything I said stands. The only point that was contentious was the point about the SORN which I retracted when told it was not illegal. It seems that it was in fact illegal and thus the point does stand. What bit do I not know what I am talking about?
  7. Now I am confused. Can we have a definitive answer on whether this is illegal or not?
  8. Thanks for the clarification. I detract my previous detraction.
  9. Far enough. I detract that comment but you are still an a*se for what you have done.
  10. Take it up with angelman not me.
  11. My post was just a copy and paste of what angelman wrote. Was the car roadworthy when you sold it? Yes or no?
  12. To add to the above.... as the car wasn't sold without a SORN then it must be considered to be roadworthy, whether you said it was for spares or not. As it had no SORN then it has to be roadworthy. That it has 6 months MOT left is irrelevant - MOT does not give carte blanche to drive a car in an unroadworthy condition. It is merely a statement that the car passed on the day of the test and it is up to the owner to keep the car in a roadworthy condition. You are stuffed and potentially a criminal.
  13. He says himself he sold it without a SORN which means that legally it must be roadworthy. It wasn't so he has broken the law.
  14. So is the spelling.
  15. How is it? You broke the law you little sh*t.
  16. WIsh I knew who this guy was. I would be very tempted to get him some free legal advice to ensure that justice was done.
  17. OK lets stick to what we know. You committed fraud When this is pointed out to you you stand by your crime and refuse to consider any sort of compensation to the victim of your crime So are you saying that you wouldn't do this again should the opportunity present itself? Removing the assumptions, what you have done is horrible, meanspirited and illegal. Again, you make me sick.
  18. It wasn't learnt though, you ripped off the bloke, committed fraud and don't have the decency to offer a refund when this is pointed out to you. You have no moral fibre and would probably do it again to some other poor soul given the chance. People like you make me sick.
  19. Go on giffgaff. Best move I ever made.
  20. As angelman pointed out, with no SORN at the time of sale the car must be roadworthy. It wasn't so you broke the law.
  21. He wanted people to support his side of things when he has actually broken the law. Taking the money since breaking the law and displaying no empathy towards the person they have blatently ripped off is pikey behaviour.
  22. No it isn't! What angelman posted is the LAW! This sin't a matter of opinion.
  23. You just admitted that you caused fraud and broke the law (it was just pointed out to you.) What you feel is irrelevant, you broke the law plain and simple and the fact that you won't do anything about it because you think he doesn't have the mental capacity to call you up on it is despicable to be honest. You don't 'feel' you've done anything wrong. Pathetic.
  24. Previous occupants are easily found.
×
×
  • Create New...