hypochondriac

If they are sensible then I doubt they would care. Does it really matter? We all know Lowe is a knobhead and we don't really need anyone else confirming this.

Not James, Gobern, Thomson, White? Certainly would keep Surman and Lallana if possible. As I have said previously, it's a confidence thing.

RE Saejis and Davis you are insane!

What about the likes of Gobern and White?

The ones in bold are the ones I would get rid off.

Of course.

Oh noes! Scary fans singing scary songs.

Fed up with this now. Mark that was a good post you made. People know my views about the Trust but if they were rebranded or restructured in some way so that people like derry were in charge with the correct intentions then I would be fully behind it. That's my last word on the subject.

Does her t-shirt say "I spike my rum?"

MAking it ****ty and cartoony.

Well you should care because these are the very people who could end up controlling the club! If they can mislead people about this then they can do it about other things. As I said my fingers were burnt with Wilde so no I m a lot more careful before I throw my weight behind someone.

Their website is still misleading though isnt it.

Well done guys. I'll be donating a couple tomorrow.

Credible sources or bull**** sources?

I would hope for that too. My only worry is that this would not happen and we would have the people involved with the Trust at the moment with too much influence at the top with the club. I was caught out with Wilde and now we have a chance for a clean slate. I don't want to be caught out again.

Big difference between attention seeking on here and your internet persona and then the Saints Trust and what they do.

My concerns have nothing to do with NI and I doubt he does have much of an ego. I am just using his running of the Trust as an example of how he would run the club should have ever get a chance to influence that. I don't agree with his decisions re the Trust at all so it's likely that I would disagree with his running of the club.

I don't want to get into it in detail because it's boring but basically I oppose many of the decisions and how the Trust is run. It follows that if the organisation is run like that then the club would be too. There are examples of deception and pretending to be a democratic organisation when it is anything but. It worries me that if the people involved with the Trust now decided to star up the new SFC we would see the same mistakes being made. That's why I oppose fan ownership, it's all about getting the right people on board.

I know many will leave but would like to keep if we can: Davis, Perry, Saejis, James, Surman, Lallana, DMG and Holmes I think a lot of them are low on confidence. Given a decent manager Lallana and Surman could reach the level they were at at the end of last season.

If we can keep our back line excluding Skacel that would be a good start. Would quite like to keep Surman if possible, he has had bad form of late but is a quality player when on form. Get rid of every other first team player and also give the likes of White, Gobern and Thomson a chance. Buy a load of new midfielders if we have som money to spend and a couple of new strikers (one with pace and one built like a brick ****house.) That would do me and I think we would have a great chance of doing well. Big IF though.

Surely you can see that he has some sort of point though Steve?

I totally agree with that.

If we could possibly keep James, Perry, Size and KD then I would be pleased.

Totally opposed to him staying. I'm amazed that so many people don't mind him staying to be honest!