hypochondriac

I think the disappointing thing is that he did it in the first place without realising that it was a silly thing to do.

We will get northampton and I will cry

They will appeal and it will be reduced.

Let people be happy for once. Who knows what he will be like but I'd rather be excited thinking he will be brilliant.

That's a disgrace. I'm very disappointed

Lol. Not many things make me laugh out loud on here

And his dad lives round the corner from me (he was my old maths teacher ages ago) and they support saints so he would be happy!

Davis Murty Trotman Jaidi Harding N'dayie Hammond James Mills Saga Lambert

I'm also pretty annoyed that the OS took so long to update with any news.

I think people are just a bit disappointed because they expected a couple of signings before the end of the window and I think most people realise that we are a couple of players away from having a really good team. I know I'm disappointed that we didn't sign anyone else.

Well we have no debt now which makes a huge difference.

****ed off.

I'm so ****ed off. What a wasted day

Rubbish

I'm gutted so far.

Signed ben haim. Good signing but will it be enough?

You're mental! 2 mill would be a great deal for us

I'll bet you a fiver glasgow saint

I think it's fine as it is. I've seen lots of progress. With one or two more signings and a couple of weeks the results will come and we'll finish mid table

Actually he seems like a really nice bloke. I've been following him closely.

We currently do not have the players to play this way. It's why we need to get a right winger and hope that Holmes and Mills can stay fit.

You do realise that walking with dinosaurs has actually generated more revenue for the BBC than it cost to make? Other broadcasters make the cheapest programmes available because they guarantee high audience share for the least risk. The advertisers dictate this strategy. If the BBC turned into this model then there would be no one willing to take a risk on programming. It would be a terrible loss and I find it difficult to understand how anyone can argue otherwise.

Were you even born in the 80s?

But as I already said, the nature of the funding means that the bbc can make programmes that would otherwise not be made. I used walking with dinosaurs as just one example

What about the people who dislike the things you enjoy on the bbc? Should they be allowed to opt out of paying for them even if it means that there is not enough money for them?