hypochondriac

Because we might need him this year and he might get a goal which would be a real positive.

Ha that keeper is gash.

I Iove you Scienza

I bloody love watching Scienza play football.

God we are the most frustrating team. Can't get the second and I'd put money on us not winning this. Hopefully I'm wrong but experience tells me I'm unlikely to be.

It would be good if we found out that Nic was created by an AI to get soggy to reply to posts because they are the lowest hanging fruit imaginable and he doesn't have to engage with any actual arguments.

Worth pointing out that any downloading of child abuse creates a market for it and is very much supporting child rape and abuse. So yes it is as bad as those crimes (as if that needed to be said.)

I wonder if soggy would have described it as hardly the crime of the centriy if it had been Boris Johnson or Tommy Robinson caught with child porn?

Obviously your whole premise is idiotic but at the risk of prolonging this ridiculous conversation, it's the fact it wasn't someone else and was in fact one of the leading faces of the BBC that made it such a big story for the BBC. It's not just the awful crime clearly, it's the context behind it.

Lucky that football isn't judged purely on stats then.

I still don't see the appeal of Azaz. Pretty limited championship player imo.

God if we don't win this it will be so frustrating.

Your judgement on players is as poor as your judgement on what constitutes a biological woman.

Cracking set of results there. Tricky games for Wrexham and Derby too. A win today would be big.

Not necessarily. I didn't know any Oxford players earlier in the season and they beat us. Just saw conor coady is playing didn't even realise he was at Charlton.

Are we? I don't know any of their players so couldn't say.

Yeah it's a balance isn't it. I was using it more to point out that it's one example of hard actions that no government is going to take because they don't want to lose .

A family member spent six weeks in hospital recently because there was no capactiy to discharge them into care. They received the best care under the circumstances but what you say is true that there's just too many people and the system is stretched to breaking point.

Also true but that's pretty hard to combat. Quite easy to say the NHS is going to concentrate more on the vital things with the nice to haves an exception rather than a rule.

The issue is that the hordes of people on welfare or those who want the state to provide everything for everyone get the same vote as everyone else so no one is going to get into power without pandering to a certain extent to groups who want support for their faction.

There's all sort of stuff that the NHS pays for now that should have no chance of public funding in a normal society.

If he leaves in the summer I feel it will be a big missed opportunity if we are in this league next year.

Not sure I agree with most of that but what we should be doing with the NHS is stop it being all things for all people. Concentrate on the things that matter the most and have excellent care in the most important things. Stop wasting NHS money on ridiculous things that shouldn't be covered on the NHS. It was never designed for half the things it covers now and it's a bloated mess.

The high court would have ruled it to be illegal. Preventing the electorate from being able to vote for two years is not on regardless of whether there's a reorganisation going on or not. It has rightly not been allowed to happen and is a further embarrassment for the government. I wonder what certain people would be saying if it was reform in power inviting councils to cancel elections. No doubt stupid words like the word fascism would be being thrown around.

Of course those councils took the opportunity to stay in power a little longer. They knew it would be a virtual wipeout for Tory and Labour. Not sure why they were given the opportunity to opt out of democracy given it's now been ruled to be illegal