hypochondriac

There appear to be a larger number of extremists claiming to be of the Islamic faith committing crimes and atrocities in the UK than other religious groups.

Why was this man in the UK? How did he remain undetected? What made him into an extremist? Who knew and helped him? Why was he not stopped earlier? Why is it particular types of people who carry out attacks of this type? How can we reduce the likelihood of this happening again in the future? These are all questions the government should be asking and finding answers for.

Imagine indulging in an ideology that uses a foreign conflict as justification for mass murder on the streets of Britain. Just evil.

The responsibility for this attack is the extremist ideology and the attackers alone.

There will no doubt be some sick people who think that some Jews got what was coming to them. I've already seen some on social media blaming Netanyahu.

Its difficult I agree. What we need to do is fully investigate where there is reports or evidence of such ideology. That means full investigations into mosques without fear or favour. Any charges that can be proven of this sort of thing then they either need prosecuting or removing from this country where possible. We have precedent for stripping someone of citizenship where they have links and options to go elsewhere and I'd like to see more of that. No longer should you be allowed to become a citizen and then just abuse this country, it's hospitality and it's citizens with little consequence. No one who isn't already a citizen should be staying in this country if there's evidence of any of this stuff. If nothing else it must make moderate and reasonable followers of Islam furious to have any association with these medieval savages. For too long authorities have turned a blind eye to a lot of this for fear of being accused of racism. If you want Reform to be less popular then one of the things the government should be doing is getting a grip on this problem and probably proscribing quite a few new groups.

If someone has come here whether legally or illegally and supports an ideology that leads to the death of Jews or others or they harbour support for terror attacks then I want us to change the law if necessary and do as much as we can to get them removed. Much of this threat has been imported and like I said we have our own problems without making things much worse. Anyone who isn't already a British citizen and it can be proven supports or indulges in this sort of ideology should be removed from this country.

It shouldn't need saying but there's loads of reasonable followers of Islam who integrate into the community and are generally just normal like you and me. There's also quite a lot with objectionable views about people like Jews for example or gay people. Or women. There's also another group that follow extremist Islam, have no intention of integrating, have awful extreme views, treat non Muslims with disdain or like pieces of meat and are potentially a danger to others. They shouldn't be in this country. We have failed by allowing so many here.

Second generation immigrants are often more extreme than their parents- Rudakubana for example -because they romanticise where their family is from. Combine that with being inculcated in backwards and extremist ideology and it's a recipe for disaster. No one is ready to have a serious conversation about it. Too many people in this country have extremist beliefs linked to Islam and it puts communities like the jewish one at risk. I know people who take it in turns on the door guarding a synagogue. It's disgusting and it's only the followers of one ideology that are doing it. This country needs to be much much tougher on extremist Islam.

Why are these evil picks in our country? We have enough of our own problems without importing true believers of a murderous ideology. Get them out.

How many Asian rape convictions have there been in Rochdale alone? Remarkable.

TBF I'm not sure the changes made much difference to that but I am obviously glad it worked out.

Maybe offer him a new deal after meeting certain conditions like playing a certain amount of games or consistent level of fitness.

I can't see any bigger clubs touching him with a ten foot pole after six more games with some form. He's been injured for essentially three years.

The main thing is rpeventing the other players from being I fluenced by those tainted from last year. Our mentality always seems to be to shit down and try to preserve the slender lead we have. We never seem to relentlessly attack.

I don't see how anyone could watch that game and give Quarshie the same rating as Edwards and Manning.

I can't remember the last time we acted like that. Maybe during the promotion season we had a couple of high scoring wins but other than that it's been years.

In what world were any of sfc's play calm after he came on?

TBF the worst one was Quarshie blatantly fouling their player and he gives nothing.

Can't say I disagree. I'd certainly like them to give that a go. I don't think Charles and Downes works.

He was the worst player on the pitch for me. Was partly responsible for the first goal, would have been responsible for the second if they hadn't fouled the keeper and no idea why the ref didn't give them a free kick from his foul on the edge of the area.

Good post. Charles is good but I don't think he's as good as some people think he is. Total saints podcast were raving about him on Sunday.

Quarshie needs dropping before he does something horrendous. Not sure who else you're putting in his place though unless THB has decided to be good again. Made up for Stewart who will probably feel for the first time that he's actually contributing to our team and the second goal was superb. No idea why we decided to just do nothing near the end and that last twenty minutes were awful. Ref was also shite and they can feel a bit hard done by with some of his bizarre decisions. All in all can't complain as its a rare win that we didn't look like getting at half time.

I agree. Just making the point.