Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    41,247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. In what way is hours of testimony from a US court discredited because there's a lot of media attention from it? I didn't say my opinion counted more than a singular judge in a British court, what I will say is that thousands of people all have the same opinion having watched the testimony about who is obviously lying and if you weren't so set in your ways and close minded you would watch it as well. How could you possibly know that people have played to the camera or been coached if you haven't watched any of it?
  2. I'd say the fact that possibly thousands but certainly multiple hundreds of people have watched hours of testimony from both parties and almost none believe what Heard has said during her testimony is worth paying attention to. Who you have respect for is irrelevant and maybe you'd have a different opinion if you were a bit less close minded and made your own mind up by listening to the unaltered testimony which is freely available.
  3. How unfortunate. I watched the evidence with my own eyes and drew my own conclusions. I'd suggest always doing that if you get the opportunity rather than trusting in the infallibility of a single judge. I haven't yet seen anyone who has watched her testimony and believed it to be true.
  4. Indeed. It wasn't credible in the slightest.
  5. I'd genuinely be surprised if you watched the testimony from Amber Heard and believed it to be true. Some things we already know to be lies for definite such as claiming she had multiple cuts on her body and her back when she was pictured numerous times the next day with no marks on her.
  6. Serious suggestion I'd have a look at some of that testimony. In my opinion it's pretty damning and also very clear which one of them is being truthful and which is fabricating a narrative. I watched with an open mind and I felt that at the start she came across quite well but later on it just descends into farce. Depp might still fail to win the case because the standard he has to meet is very high but IMO he's going to win in the court of public opinion.
  7. That isn't what he's doing at all. He's suing to challenge the article that she contributed to that essentially called him a domestic abuser and ended his career. During the court case so far there has been no one beyond Amber herself who can corroborate the claims that she is a victim of domestic abuse (although Depp is clearly a pretty messed up individual.) The court case is the UK was not public, was in front of a judge and the judge alone decided that Amber's testimony was "credible" (although we never got to see that testimony.) That doesn't make him guilty of domestic abuse.
  8. Blimey I agree with soggy!
  9. Did you watch her testimony last week? Did you consider it credible?
  10. Erm that isn't what the high court found.
  11. Why would you want sheffield United or Huddersfield up over Luton?
  12. Absolutely terrible idea on a par with appointing Mark Hughes. No thanks.
  13. I think we did well to get as many points as we had to be honest. Problem is we are so inconsistent and Ralph doesn't seem to be able to change a game. We have a really poor squad but even knowing that I think we should try someone else.
  14. The anticipation is killing me.
  15. Surprised this hasn't leaked yet. We've normally seen it by now havent we?
  16. Your post would have more weight about calling people things to their face if you hadn't called people rape apologist, racist and part of the far right. IMO that's much worse than calling someone a cuntt.
  17. NSFW bewb PMs. Salad days.
  18. Solid result that.
  19. You have to laugh. Thank goodness we are safe but our team is so weird how we go hot and cold all the time. Looked like world beaters earlier this season and this is just bizarre. Also hilarious that Long still gets in, our team.
  20. I wonder if we will lose every game until the end of the season now.
  21. There's a long history of very young players being inconsistent. He's clearly got quality and there's no indication that he's suddenly going to be rubbish for the rest of his career simply because he's gone through a few months of poor form.
  22. No it doesn't. He's 20 years old.
  23. Ridiculous. We need 1 x gk, 1 x 10 and one maybe 2 strikers. Maybe a cm So 4 or 5 signings.
  24. If the kit was white with a wide red stripe how would everyone feel? That sounds like not a bad kit to me.
  25. Huge congrats to Lyanco who put in a shift after so long away. Personally I'd be playing him most weeks next year.
×
×
  • Create New...