hypochondriac

Then they can come in via the legitimate route.

How about doing an Australia and guaranteeing that anyone coming here illegally will be removed as soon as it is feasible? That would certainly bring the numbers down and we wouldn't need the cooperation of France.

They aren't supposed to be "passing through France." That's the whole point. They may view it as passing through but that's not factually accurate. There's no reason for them to leave France and circumvent the immigration system. Its an insult to all those who go through the proper channels. I don't blame them for attempting to come here but I do blame the government for being perceived to be a soft touch and for allowing it to happen.

Where did I say they were French? They are in France though which is the point I was making.

Surely there's a massive distinction between immigrants who we allow in who have applied through the proper channels and anyone who fancies travelling from France arriving in a dinghy?

You mean leaving a western developed nation like France to come here?

I know that the opportunity is there, its just that most studies I have seen prove that the majority keep to their own bubbles and their own safe space of opinions.

This is rivalling skacel.

For the vast majority of people on twitter, its never been about plurality of opinion tbf.

I thought you were suggesting it did with your comment about taking back control? In or out of the EU, we shouldn't be having migrants coming across the channel illegally. There should be a mechanism for immediately returning them and I'm hoping they are sorting something behind the scenes.

I'm proud to say I've never read anything mlt has written on twitter.

Surely the point was to have the ability to take control? That doesn't necessarily mean that the government of the day will utilise that control in the correct way.

We've had our differences but you're absolutely spot on with that.

Let's hope this really is your final word on the subject. Doubt it though.

Firstly why does anyone care? Why is it now fashionable to be really invested in what anyone decides to spout on social media? Why does mlt's views on something he has no expertise in be something that anyone would be the slightest bit interested in? Its a bizarre modern phenomenon. Secondly, anyone writing to sky to try to get him sacked is just absolute scum. Anyone who supports them is also the lowest of the low.

Saints don't need fans like you. The club would be better off if you went elsewhere.

No it isn't. What is absolutely embarrassing and moronic is caring about what a footballing legend writes on twatter to such a degree that you won't shut up about it across multiple forums. Matt winding up cancel culture supporting weirdos like you is just another reason why he is a hero. More power to matt and I hope he continues. He's gone up in my estimation.

Anyone who abuses matt is a twat. If they are saints fans then they are even bigger twats. I'd rather have a beer with one of our morbidly obese jester hat wearing cretins in the Northam than go anywhere near these types of scum. If anyone has contacted sky attempting to get him cancelled then they deserve a shoeing.

God our social media fans are an embarrassment. This is perhaps the third or fourth thread started by someone about mlt's bloody twatter account. I might post a lot on here but at least I'm not harping on about that. Bloody losers.

I k ow it doesn't excuse it but its pretty obvious.

It's more simple than that. He's just autistic.

Steve do you know why there is a particular issue with the lounge? That seems to be the worst section.

*waits for mlg to arrive to tell you that he's not on here constantly.

Cheers I'll check it out.

Think it's time to have a look back on the ugly inside again.