hypochondriac

I think it's being not very good combined with the air of superiority she exudes and playing the race card whilst coming accross as not particularly bright. See here for a clear example:

Yes. His point was that it was the racist actions of others giving people preferential treatment based on skin colour that meant he was not able to be sure that someone black was not hired due to the colour of their skin rather than their ability. Not racist at all.

His point was that DEI hiring means that it was no longer certain that the most qualified or most competent person was getting jobs anymore since hiring was not necessarily on merit anymore.

I'm cool with that as long as you don't try to murder me with a rifle.

Not sure if you're being serious or not but liberal in the UK typically refers to classical liberals which is more associated with centrism. Liberalism in America is indeed more associated with being further left and progressives.

A liberal in America has a different meaning to the ones over here.

Because many people who are hardcore supporters of both and who claim to be big Christians frequently show support for and act in ways that I consider to be very unchristian.

I don't disagree. I don't think either political party in America really has any business with aligning themselves with Christian values.

Active participant in antifa discord servers apparently. Considered Kirk a fascist. Sounds pretty far left to me regardless of what his family are.

I don't know about all of those but I know for a fact that some of them are blatant misinterpretations of what he said.

As long as we agree that neither deserved to be murdered nor brought it on themselves then great.

I'm not sure who is arguing with who.

I'm not sure he was intending to shock. I think he genuinely believed what he said.

Who said otherwise? I literally said that the killings were completely different. Some were arguing that the actions of Charlie Kirk increased his risk of being killed. The same is true of other people who have been killed including George Floyd. I don't hold either of them responsible for their murders.

He had some views that could be described as extreme. Still doesn't deserve to be shot though.

I think you're arguing with yourself. There's also deranged people in the police too.

The deaths are very different. My point is that if you're going to say-as some on here have-that Charlie Kirk increased his risk of death due to his views and associations with controversial people, then you can say similar about Floyd. To be clear I think both were murdered and I don't agree with either view about Charlie and George

I don't think he'll be in charge for the next election -something that was inconceivable when they got in.

Clearly the more crimes you commit and the more you associate yourself with a world of criminality then I'm sure you bring the odds down. Associating with criminals and drugs is dangerous. I'm not sure why that's a controversial view.

Tyler Robinson apparently.

Agreed. You can bet your life if it had been a figure on the left gunned down you'd be getting the same twattish responses from some on the other side. It's wrong and it doesn't matter what the politics of the person is. We can all agree that shit like this should be condemmed.

More than anyone, if Bazunu fucks up then the fans won't forget it. I agree, McCarthy in may be smarter.

Is this confirmed ?

A red and white storm sweeping out the fishy few.

His career choices and associations increased the risk.