-
Posts
41,555 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by hypochondriac
-
You don't know that. Currently 12th best team in the prem and not far off 6th. With a kind draw you never know.
-
He was my motm today. Really hope he can keep this up because he was superb.
-
One tit and one b*llock
-
Non-binary refbots
-
Bet you can't wait till 2030 when refbot 3000 is making every call and the average attendance at the football is 20.
-
I don't think most people do want certainty, they just want to have the horrible glaring errors abolished.
-
Saints v Spurs NYD - Build Up & Match Thread
hypochondriac replied to John Boy Saint's topic in The Saints
Since the upturn in form? Hasn't been too many rotten performances. -
Saints v Spurs NYD - Build Up & Match Thread
hypochondriac replied to John Boy Saint's topic in The Saints
Everyone has an off day. -
Saints v Spurs NYD - Build Up & Match Thread
hypochondriac replied to John Boy Saint's topic in The Saints
And he has a smug rat face which doesn't help. -
Saints v Spurs NYD - Build Up & Match Thread
hypochondriac replied to John Boy Saint's topic in The Saints
Sorry I misremembered. Still though we are in good form and a thrashing isn't definite by any means. -
.
-
Saints v Spurs NYD - Build Up & Match Thread
hypochondriac replied to John Boy Saint's topic in The Saints
Possibly but maybe not. We drew with Chelsea last time out and put in a great performance. -
Lol. This is the future that some on here want.
-
To try and describe that a bit better, Wesley was walking back away from goal when he went up for a header that he didn't win. A slither, and I mean a tiny, tiny piece of shoe leather, was ruled to be offside as he did so. They had to draw so many lines on the screen that you could barely work out what was going on. IT WAS NOT OFFSIDE AS WE ALL UNDERSTAND IT. Let the goal stand.
-
Seemingly yet another joke decision in the villa Burnley game. Haven't seen it yet but lots of discontentment again.
-
Is the technology 100% accurate?
-
This kind of post right here is yet more evidence for why many posters on here believe you to be on the austic spectrum. Many on the autistic spectrum have difficulty understanding emotions in others and a low emotional intelligence. Hth.
-
It's my opinion based in a long history where you take everything literally, appear to have little understanding of other's emotions and many of your replies seem robotic and lacking in emotion of any kind.
-
I'd say emotional intelligence is very low.
-
Again, that's the exact same response I would receive if I made similar arguments to David icke. Do you consider it close minded to dismiss his theories about life being a global computer program controlled by neighbouring planets or reptilian elites controlling global politics? And I notice you haven't answered any of my other questions. I don't necessarily disagree with the notion of a higher power in the autistic manner that MLG does, but I'm not going to pretend that specific prophecies about the 20th century exist when they quite clearly do not.
-
No the football World just doesn't want pedantic a*seholes to be in charge of the game ruining it for normal fans who don't want goal validity to be decided by a hair width. It will be adressed as soon as practically possible because most fans realise it isn't good for the game. If you think it doesn't need changing and won't be changed then that's fine. You're not right but you're entitled to that opinion.
-
But I would get a similar response from flat earthers and 9/11 truthers. I don't have to watch hours of conspiracy videos on YouTube to know that there are not specific prophecies in the bible that unequivocally prove that events in the 20th and 21st centuries were predicted by passages in the bible. If those specific prophecies existed then we would all know about it and you would be earnestly posting them. It's the same response David icke gives to criticism by the way- unless you're willing to read all his books and attend his 9 hour lectures you can't offer valid criticism to his ramblings.
-
Well then I'm sorry I should have said you sound insane. I have no idea about your actual level of sanity though I would imagine you would have quite a bit in common with conspiracy theorists as that's what you remind me of. Lets be honest, you don't have any proof that so called prophecies are referring to the specific events of the 20th century, in the same way that followers of nostradamus have no idea that his similarly vague predictions have come true. They take events from the last couple of centuries and then use them to fit a narrative.
-
Superb argument. You asked me to elaborate, I did so and then you just respond like that. I reckon I'd be much more open to persuasion than hardcore atheists like MLG but not when you're so dismissive of someone who challenges you.
-
Because "marrying up to world events" just sounds like a David icke conspiracy theory. There are no specifics from prophecies in the bible, you can twist things around to fit things to make it look like it's some sort of prophecy rather like flat earthers, 9/11 truthers or fake moon landing nuts, but to a neutral observer you just sound a bit weird. How can you be sure that this so called prophecy was talking about the 20th and 21st century? What if you got it wrong and they are actually talking about events 300 years from now? What gives you the certainty that this stuff written down in a form of Chinese whispers is actually some miraculous divine prophecy from, hundreds of years ago?