hypochondriac

That's the enthusiasm I like to see!

Some bloke apparently faking cancer a few years ago.

I'm just chuffed I get to see him again in a Saints shirt even if it's just for one game.

Give one to Fernandes and you'll be getting one of these

I didn't have you down as a prolific Mumsnet poster.

Worth a watch. Even more impactful when you realise the interviewer was abused by his dad as a child so it offends him more than the average person.

If they get the stoke keeper I'll cry.

Not sure I agree with that. I thought parsons acquitted himself well and gave diplomatic answers to some difficult questions. Trollope was great but then he didn't get as challenging questions so it was easier to deal with. Spors got better as it went on. It may be that he's not much of a public speaker which isn't a requirement of the job. He's clearly knowledgeable and it's great that he's accountable so he knows he will live and die by his decisions. Overall I thought they all gave a good account of themselves - certainly better than Semmens ever did - and I was left with the impression Parsons especially really cares about what he's doing (particularly when I had a quick word with him afterwards.) I thought a lot of the questions were reasonable this year although I wish people wouldn't just use it as an opportunity to moan and phrase things in a more constructive way.

I'm not sure that's true. You have to beat the odds and stay up once and then it gets easier. Yes it's very difficult but the likes of Brighton, Bournemouth and Brentford have managed it.

I don't think so. He was saying that the only person near him was Garnacho with less appearances. Not sure that gives an indication on price.

For good or I'll it's spors' decision and he's owned it. That seems fair enough to me.

Wasn't that referring to Fernandes?

Personally I thought it was very interesting. parsons is very competent and I enjoyed hearing how accountable Spors is and how he's making all the football decisions and the buck stops with him. Enlightening about Stephens and basically owned the decision and said he wanted him to have one which answers that. Much better answers than semmens ever gave.

Maybe I asked a question and want people to be kind

He didn't do that at all this year. He does a great job to keep the conversation flowing in my opinion.

Yes I agree that was wank.

I thought the questions on the whe were better than previous years. Makes me laugh when people on here have a go at reasonable questions without either asking one themselves or offering decent alternative ones.

We should have signed him last season.

And neither should there be. If these rumours are true then I'm very pleased we are looking at some proven Championship quality.

I'm pretty sure James obrien had a chat about her this week hence the sudden interest.

Sadly it doesn't do that so the debate will rumble on. It did say you can throw a shoe over a pub though so it's not all bad.

Based on a review of benjii’s posts across SaintsWeb, I’d say yes—he can definitely be considered amusing, particularly in the way he injects wit, self-deprecation, and casual flair into discussions. Here are a few examples that highlight his humour: --- Examples of Benjii’s Wit and Charm 1. Subtle Human Observation In the thread “Today, I met a skate”, benjii wryly comments: > “He did say he thought they were going to batter us this season but after I said, ‘really, you actually think that?’ about 20 times, I could see he didn't really think it.” This kind of understated, very human commentary discreetly pokes fun at overblown bravado—dry, yet effective . 2. Sarcastic Witticisms When another user quoted cliché reporting jargon with a “Reported,” benjii responded: > “Please keep me on the right path.” Subtle humour, politely delivered—classic forum sarcasm! 3. Animated Car Enthusiasm In the Motoring Forum discussing Maseratis, benjii painted a vivid image of driving his new car: > “Standard Auto mode… feels like an exec saloon in traffic. Switch to sport… it gets feisty and if you floor it, it throws you back into your seat and it ROARS!” Humorous, with just the right dash of playful overstatement—captures both passion and presence. 4. Perceptive Banter In a 2010 thread about a striker’s performance, benjii argued: > “…anyone who doesn't agree with me is just a bit clueless, as it’s so screamingly obvious that he's a very good player at this level.” Cheeky and over-the-top in a way that’s clearly tongue-in-cheek, yet confident. --- Summary Table: What Makes Benjii Amusing Style Element Example & Effect Dry, understated humour Calls out bravado with simple, knowing quips Polite sarcasm Delivers sarcasm in a polished, humorous way Energetic exaggeration Uses vivid imagery for comedic effect (e.g., Maserati "roars") Confident irony Playfully states his correctness with self-aware boldness --- Final Take Yes, benjii is amusing—he brings a thoughtful, light-hearted edge to discussions without going overboard. His humour often lands with a knowing nod rather than a belly laugh, making his posts enjoyable without being distracting.

I think I spotted someone

Good shout! Absolutely! Let’s find some alternative celebrity comparisons for Rallyboy, based on his distinctive posting style on SaintsWeb — which combines wit, sarcasm, flair for performance, and a certain irreverent edge. Here are several personality matches that capture different aspects of his online persona: 🎭 Celebrity Comparisons for Rallyboy 1. Charlie Brooker Why? Satirical, misanthropic, and endlessly annoyed by the world — but in a funny, eloquent way. Parallel: Rallyboy’s sardonic political takes and dry humour resemble Brooker’s Screenwipe rants. 2. Armando Iannucci Why? Creator of The Thick of It — expert in turning public outrage and chaos into biting comedy. Parallel: Rallyboy’s posts often feel like Malcolm Tucker without the swearing filter (well, mostly). 3. David Mitchell Why? Overthinks everything and then explodes in hyper-logical fury. Parallel: Rallyboy often dissects a situation with surreal precision before delivering a theatrical punchline. 4. Karl Pilkington Why? Unintentionally hilarious deadpan delivery, often grumbling at the absurdity of modern life. Parallel: Some of Rallyboy’s quips are so oddball that you can almost hear Karl saying them with a confused frown. 5. Billy Connolly Why? Irreverent storyteller with an unpredictable flow and a gift for exaggeration. Parallel: Rallyboy’s rants (especially match threads) often spiral into delightful theatrical nonsense. 6. Stewart Lee Why? Sarcastic, meta-commentary style, especially when mocking public opinion or media tropes. Parallel: Rallyboy can sometimes sound like he’s mocking the very forum dynamic he’s part of. 7. Hugh Laurie (in House mode) Why? Snarky, brilliant, weary, and occasionally amused by other people's stupidity. Parallel: Rallyboy's replies to daft posts often have that “are you serious?” vibe that House delivered so well. 🎯 Summary Personality Vibes Celebrity What It Captures About Rallyboy Charlie Brooker Political cynicism + sharp satire Armando Iannucci Chaos channeller; brilliantly irreverent David Mitchell Neurotic humour + righteous frustration Karl Pilkington Absurdist logic and dry disbelief Billy Connolly Wild comedic tangents and storytelling Stewart Lee Intelligent sarcasm and slow-burn wit Hugh Laurie (House) Wry

I'll check. In the meantime... The accusation that Trousers “sits on the fence” is something that occasionally surfaces—but it’s worth unpacking what that actually means on SaintsWeb. Here's a breakdown: --- What's the Fence-Sitter Label Based On? **“Sitting on the fence”** typically implies reluctance to take a stand or being overly safe in opinions. In this case, one user humorously remarked: > “@Trousers your ability to sit on the fence is almost legendary in here.” This suggests a perception that Trousers sometimes acknowledges multiple viewpoints without clearly favoring any. --- Does the Label Hold Up? Evidence That Counters the Fence-Sitter Label: In the Ronnie O’Sullivan thread, Trousers clearly expressed a strong opinion: > “Surely the greatest sportsman alive today?…GOAT” And later: “I suspected it wouldn’t be too long before the conversation headed down this path. Valid opinions, of course; I just happen to hold the opposite opinion.” This shows Trousers actually takes a firm stand, even when in the minority. Where the Fence-Sitting Perception Might Come From: Trousers often uses balanced phrasing—like “Valid opinions… I just happen to hold the opposite opinion”—which can come across as diplomatic rather than combative. This measured style may be interpreted as neutrality, especially compared to more heated or partisan posters. --- Verdict: Fair Label or Misunderstood? Not entirely fair: Trousers does hold strong viewpoints when he chooses to—he just frames them thoughtfully, not abrasively. The “fence-sitting” comment is more a lighthearted jab at his calm, respectful tone, not an accurate reflection of his willingness to engage fully in debates. --- TL;DR: Trousers isn’t avoiding the argument—he’s just navigating it with poise. So while the label might keep the banter moving, it shouldn’t obscure the fact that he often has a clear position once the dust settles.