Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    41,058
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. 'but instead had internal testicles and a “micropenis”' People who know what they are talking about like expert endocrinologists? I'd say they're a pretty decent authority on the matter. You asked for evidence and when it is provided you suggest it isn't credible because it doesn't say what you want it to. Khelif competed as a "recognised woman" because the criteria to compete was that your passport said you are a woman even if you are a biological man with internal testicals and a penis. I'm entirely comfortable with saying that someone who has a penis is a man. Glad we can clarify that there's nothing bigoted whatsoever in that statement. If you have a penis - micro or otherwise - then you're a biological man. It's unfortunate for the person involved but no biological man should be competing in combat sports against biological women. Khelif knew the results of the test and knowingly put the health of women in danger in order to steal a medal. Simple as that.
  2. Glad I could provide the link then. Are you happy for someone with no uterus, a micropenis and testicles to be referred to as a biological male now? Or is that still a bigoted opinion to have?
  3. https://reduxx.info/algerian-boxer-imane-khelif-has-xy-chromosomes-and-testicles-french-algerian-medical-report-admits/ Why is this story not credible? Can a woman have testicles?
  4. Clearly a beautiful woman. With female testicles.
  5. Something they explicitly said they weren't going to do by the way.
  6. Cough cough.
  7. Amazing. The first ever woman with testicles in existence.
  8. It will be full of grievance and race baiting. Sometimes labour does the odd thing that makes me think they deserve a bit more support from me and then I remember the party is full of these types of people and I quickly suppress that feeling.
  9. Absolutely pathetic from whoever this is inside labour. Besides they've got Lammy who has his position due to his skin colour so not sure why they need more tokenism. Give people positions on merit ffs.
  10. Think I agree with the consensus on here. A large percentage of Trump's support come from people who aren't going to vote.
  11. A few polls going for Harris this morning so you may be right.
  12. What about if you attend a lot of the games like me and you still think you're a boring, whining, patronising arse?
  13. I thought we were crap but plenty of times we have played quite well and lost so I'll take it. Gives us an outside chance of not being relegated by January.
  14. Unless it's Potter I wouldn't bother personally.
  15. 9 points to beat Derby...
  16. This is all setup for a late Everton winner.
  17. The sort of performance that's perfectly acceptable if you're mid table. For a team that needs to win, if/when we lose this game it's not good enough to have such little in attack.
  18. Wrong thread!
  19. I thought the purpose of playing it around at the back all the time was to draw players out of position so we had opportunities in attack. If we have no chances to speak of then what's the point?
  20. Dibling has to come on for Armstrong at half time for me. Personally I'd like to see Amo Ameyew too.
  21. Everton look a lot more nimble at escaping our tackles. I wish we posed more of a threat going forward.
  22. It's quite sad to see someone who was such a hero last year be so out of his depth.
  23. Our crosses from the right have been horrendous. To an Everton player every single time.
  24. Downes proper crap so far.
  25. I'd 100% have Sam A A in there. Sam lm, Dibling RM with Lallana and Fernandes in the middle is a potentially brilliant team.
×
×
  • Create New...