hypochondriac

It will be "we played some really great stuff, frustrated by conceding two after the penalty miss but it's my fault."

I thought lesley looked good before he got tired. Second half was like it usually is when things aren't working. Meandering and nothingy.

I'll now wait to see the second part of your prediction come true.

Nailed it.

Genuinely could have been 4 or 5 and we never looked like scoring.

I don't think we have been that terrible defensively to be honest. It's the other end where the problem lies. We haven't tested the keeper other than Dibling once. Depressing.

We should have made changes at half time. No idea why we have wasted time.

That's a ridiculous argument. Tyler Dibling being good isn't a negative indicator for the rest of the team.

We had the best half hour of the season. Then it went to shit.

Awful defending. No threat up top. Not looking promising.

Get Cornet on at half time.

Lesley has bee superb so far

For me that's been our best ten minutes of the season.

Overall you have to give credit to Martin for that lineup. I wouldn't have played Stephens but we know he's Martins favourite.

I think it's going to be very close. I'm not sure Trump's goal is to 'win' the debates anyway - arguably he lost them against Hillary-it's to become a talking point and in people's consciousness. I'm not sure how that's going with the general public but he's achieving that online with the eating the cats stuff and a few other memes. He's been underestimated in polling before. I think it will be a big surprise if it's a clear Harris win eventually.

Anyone have a prediction for the team we will play? I'd like us to play 4-2-3-1 but I think Martin will go for 5-3-2 again. Ramsdale Sugawara Bednarek THB Stephens kwp Dibling Downes Fernandes Archer bbd The team I'd like to see: Ramsdale Sugawara Bednarek THB kwp Downes lesley Dibling Lallana bbd/Cornet Archer

I doubt he has individual files. That would make it too difficult for him to generalise and cast aspersions on as wide a group as possible. More likely it's just one big file he labels "far right" and another one marked "the Jews."

If we did go down New keeper /bazunu Bree/new rb Edwards/Stephens bednarek Taylor New dm Smallbone Armstrong Lallana/new am bbd/SAA Archer That's a very good championship team even before reinforcements and you'd hope we wouldn't have to sell too many

Think I mentioned before that my brother in law was a professional footballer who played at Saint Mary's, scored at Wembley etc. It was really eye opening to me how obsessed he was with football and honing his skills with his dad from a very young age. I wasn't bad at football but never anywhere near professional. I just didn't have the interest to that degree or the skill!

Good character on the pitch too. Off the pitch not so much but the less said about that the better!

That's not the reason we let Alcaraz go. We let him go because he can't play the passing football in the manner that Martin wants.

Indeed. The whole point of 3-5-2 is to keep it tight and try to nick a goal. If we're going toose anyway then might as well try something more attacking and see if anything changes.

Quite. I was plenty critical of the conservatives. They were crap. Only fair that Labour gets the same level of scrutiny- albeit they haven't been there for long yet.

The train driver settlement was no strings attached and included paying people who have already left. Like I said, it was a political choice to do so.

Doesn't sound like it "Bridget Phillipson, the education Secretary, refused to say where the money for the train driver pay deal would come from. The Government spends £12bn a year subsidising the rail industry, leaving open the possibility that taxpayers will fund the pay rise."