hypochondriac

That's like saying the KKK are not fascists, some of their activities have been described as fascist. When a significant percentage of members within an organisation commit domestic terrorism then at what point is it accurately described as a domestic terrorist group? Antifa allows domestic terrorism to be committed in their name and a number of members have been involved in violence and unprovoked attacks. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2017/08/28/black-clad-antifa-attack-right-wing-demonstrators-in-berkeley/?utm_term=.decde9a1ee16 http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/18/us/unmasking-antifa-anti-fascists-hard-left/index.html http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/25/former-college-prof-arrested-for-antifa-bike-lock-attacks-in-berkeley/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4828672/Masked-antifa-swarm-Berkeley-rally-assaulting-several.html

Claims that it is a self defence organisation is frankly idiotic considering the amount of violent incidents that have been perpetrated by them under little or no provocation. Smashing up and setting fire to shops in Berkley and smashing people over the head with bike locks is not self defence when the only reason they were violently protesting is because someone said something they disapproved of. Words are not violence yet antifa will claim that they are so that they can use violent actions in response. It's disgusting and most right thinking people will abhor their actions just as they abhor any violence that stems from the far right. It's little wonder that they were officially recognised by US homeland security whilst Obama was still in power as domestic terrorists because that is exactly what they are. Also massive lol that the link you sent me to has progressive in the title. Nothing biased about that source! [emoji23]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/antifa-domestic-terrorists-us-security-agencies-homeland-security-fbi-a7927881.html I accept your apology.

Laughable. No one has ever claimed that "nazis" were created by anti fascists. They were however undoubtedly encouraged by those who use identity politics in some sort of war and by the domestic terrorist group antifa. You're the muppet sunshine if you try to claim otherwise.

And you likewise [emoji23]

You could just as easily accuse the hard left corbynistas of encouraging a hard right extremist fringe. I would consider that more likely personally, particularly when you consider how leftie types largely dominate the media landscape.

Losersaint is much more appropriate.

What expectation you weirdo? Muted applause isn't an expectation that the new owner is negative but people are hardly going to clap like seals just because they show up, people have to earn trust and support.

Would be nice to hear from them at some point about their plans or why they have bought into the club. Something like a radio solent fans forum might be a useful time to ask some questions.

Franchise fc beating the Dons.

https://youtu.be/qjlhg_3Jjew "We've got to recognise the fact that British Pakistani men are disproportionately engaged in grooming gangs"

A few butthurt cabbies have moaned and they bent to the pressure. Pathetic and the public will be the ones who missed out

I saw this post and I knew who had written it before I confirmed it by looking.

Tommy Robinson is a tough one. I've listened to some of his most recent stuff and I haven't heard anything he has said that is racist. However, he has clearly held racist views in the past - I believe he may have been secretly filmed using some choice language- and his membership of the edl was never a good idea- something he apparently regrets. Unfortunately he's not exactly posh or particularly well spoken so he's never likely to get a fair crack with the media but having said that I don't think he can really complain about some of the names he is called considering views he has held over the years. That doesn't mean he doesn't make some valid points that should be considered now but I do think the way he puts some of his points across is not really helpful to any debate and is designed to provoke a reaction and get people's backs up rather than to affect change.

You sound deranged.

Much much too early to be gloating about Everton's current position. They have played some tough teams so far.

I didn't say there weren't things to discuss but clearly there are usually more talking points after a loss than a win.

It's not incredible is it really. As pointed out a number of times, much more controversy and things to talk about after a loss than a win. There's only so many times everyone can agree that it was a good three points and a positive performance.

It works perfectly with a vpn

What I will say though is that palace are the opposite of Watford. I wouldn't be confident if we play a team who employ the press.

Indeed. Clearly some good additions. Need to score another though

Good work from long.

So weird how palace are standing do far off us. They are just letting is play in front of them

I don't think giving a pessimistic prediction based on what has happened before equates to not being able to handle it.

I don't think giving a pessimistic prediction based on what has happened before equates to not being able to handle it.